All Resources
In this article:
minus iconplus icon
Share the Blog

Rising to the Challenge of Data Security Leadership

Min Read

Any attempt to perfectly prescribe exactly what you need to build an effective data security role or team is a fool’s errand. There are simply too many variables you need to take into account - the size of the organization, the amount of data it has, the type of data that needs to be secured, the organization’s culture and risk appetite- all of these need to be weighed and balanced.

However, with that disclaimer and caveat in place, I do think there are some broad best practices that apply to almost every data security role, and those are the ones I want to focus on in this blog. 

Know Your Inputs and Restrictions - and Document them

Every data security team has a certain set of ‘inputs’ and restrictions under whose framework they need to operate. These can be regulatory frameworks like GDPR and CCPA, but they also include agreements with customers and partners and the level of risk the company is willing to accept. 

These inputs exist for every data security role. And the first thing you need to do when stepping into a data security position is to document these inputs and ensure that everyone’s on the same page. This isn’t the type of project that can be done by a single person or even a single team. Legal needs to be involved. Privacy needs to be involved. Security needs to be involved. The scope of this varies by company, but the main point is that there needs to be a governance arm telling you what the requirements and policies are before you can get to work enforcing anything.

It’s also important to remember that there are two different groups here. You have the leaders from the teams I mentioned. And then you have the engineers and executors that implement those policies. All the documentation in the world won’t help if there’s a communication breakdown between the deciders and the implementers. 

Managing Risk, Managing People

Whether you’re an individual or a team responsible for data security, it’s important to keep in mind the big picture - your answer can’t always be ‘no’ when asked ‘can I do this with our data’. Understand that there’s a business reason behind the question - and find a way to help them achieve their goals without violating the risk and legal parameters you’ve already established. 

The data security role also shouldn’t be responsible for actually going into the platforms to remediate issues. As far as possible, the actual remediation should be done by the teams that manage those platforms every day. If there’s 10 different data sources, the security team should be identifying those issues using data security tools. But they should also be - with minimal friction- dispatching the alerts, tasks, and remediation steps to the relevant teams. And the security team should be assisting these teams with developing, rolling out, and managing secure configurations so that, ideally, alerts and remediation tasks become less frequent over time.

Besides managing systems, there’s an enormous human component when it comes to data security success. (In general, I believe that most of our problems in security have a human dimension.) There are egos and authority on the line in discussions around data and how it should be used. The business side of the company may want to gather and retain as much data as possible. The privacy and legal teams may want as little as possible. Security leaders in general and particularly data security leaders will need to get along well with the heads of these various departments. They need to play the role of harmonizer between the competing demands and be able to get things done. This involves working with the peers of the CISO - head of legal, head of privacy, and making judgment calls in a space (data security)  that historically hasn’t had that much authority. Of course, that’s all changing now as every country and region adopts new data security regulations.

Managing up, down, and across the company is the main data security skill. It’s what helps separate  effective security leaders. Working well with engineers gets the data secured. Working well with legal, privacy, and compliance is the scaffolding that supports all of your effort. And like every security role, working well with the CISO is critical.

Data Security's a Great Career - Just Take Care Not to Burn Out

To wrap up, I’d say - there’s never been a better time to get into data security. The growth of regulations - and associated consequences for non compliance- means companies are investing in data security talent. For anyone looking to move from a general security or IT role into a data security role, a great first step is to improve your cloud and data skills. Understanding your company’s cloud environment, its different use cases, tools, and business objectives will give you the context you need to be successful in the role. It will help you understand the inputs and pressures on the different teams, and grow your perspective beyond just the technical part of the job.

The key to avoiding burnout is understanding the nature of the job. There’s always going to be a new tool, stakeholder, or regulation that you’re going to face. There’s no ‘finishing’ the work in any final sense. What you spent all month working on might be irrelevant overnight. That’s the game. And if it’s for you, I hope this blog helps in some small way think about what makes a successful data security professional.

Jason Chan is a security generalist with years of experience in system, network, and application security. Chan is the former VP of Information Security at Netflix.

Subscribe

Latest Blog Posts

Ariel Rimon
Ariel Rimon
March 30, 2026
3
Min Read

Web Archive Scanning: WARC, ARC, and the Forgotten PII in Your Compliance Crawls

Web Archive Scanning: WARC, ARC, and the Forgotten PII in Your Compliance Crawls

One of the most interesting blind spots I see in mature security programs isn’t a database or a SaaS app. It’s web archives.

If you’re in financial services, you may be required to archive every version of your public website for years. Legal teams preserve web content under hold. Marketing and product teams crawl competitors for competitive intel. Security teams capture phishing pages and breach sites for analysis. All of that activity produces WARC and ARC files - standard formats for storing captured web content.

Now ask yourself: what’s in those archives?

Where Web Archives Come From and Why They Get Ignored

In most enterprises, web archives are created in predictable ways, but rarely treated as data stores that need to be actively managed. Compliance teams crawl and preserve marketing pages, disclosures, and rate sheets to meet record-keeping requirements. Legal teams snapshot websites for e-discovery and retain those captures for years. Product and growth teams scrape competitor sites, pricing pages, and documentation, while security teams collect phishing kits, fake login pages, and breach sites for analysis.

All of this content ends up stored as WARC or ARC files in object storage or file shares. Once the initial crawl is complete and the compliance requirement is satisfied, these archives are typically dumped into an S3 bucket or on-prem share, referenced in a ticket or spreadsheet, and then quietly forgotten.

That’s where the risk begins. What started as a compliance or research activity turns into a growing, unmonitored data store - one that may contain sensitive and regulated information, but sits outside the scope of most security and privacy programs.

What’s Really Inside a WARC or ARC File?

A single WARC from a routine compliance crawl of your own site can contain thousands of pages. Many of those pages will have:

  • Customer names and emails
  • Account IDs and usernames
  • Phone numbers and mailing addresses
  • Perhaps even partial transaction details in page content, forms, or query strings

If you’re scraping external sites, those files can hold third‑party PII: profiles, contact details, and public record data. Threat intel archives may include:

  • Captured credentials from phishing kits
  • Breach data and exposed account information
  • Screenshots or HTML copies of login pages and portals

Meanwhile, the archives themselves grow quietly in S3 buckets and on‑prem file shares, rarely revisited and almost never scanned with the same rigor you apply to “primary” systems.

From a privacy perspective, this is a real problem. Under GDPR and similar laws, individuals have the right to request access to and deletion of their personal data. If that data lives inside a 3‑year‑old WARC file you can’t even parse, you have no practical way or scalable way to honor that request. Multiply that across years of compliance archiving, legal holds, scraping campaigns, and threat intel crawls, and you’re sitting on terabytes of unmanaged web content containing PII and regulated data.

Why Traditional DLP and Discovery Can’t Handle WARC and ARC

Most traditional DLP (Data Loss Prevention) and data discovery tools were designed for a simpler data landscape, focused on emails, attachments, PDFs, Office documents, and flat text logs or CSV files. When these tools encounter formats like WARC or ARC files, they typically treat them as opaque blobs of data, relying on basic text extraction and regex-based pattern matching to identify sensitive information.

This approach breaks down with web archives. WARC and ARC files are complex container formats that store full HTTP interactions, including requests, responses, headers, and payloads. A single web archive can contain thousands of captured pages and resources: HTML, JavaScript, CSS, JSON APIs, images, and PDFs, often compressed or encoded in ways that require reconstructing the original HTTP responses to interpret correctly.

As a result, legacy DLP tools cannot reliably parse or analyze WARC and ARC files. Instead, they surface only fragmented data such as headers, binary content, or partial HTML, without reconstructing the full user-visible context. This means they miss critical elements like complete web pages, DOM structures, form inputs, query strings, request bodies, and embedded assets where sensitive data such as PII, credentials, or financial information may exist.

The result is a significant compliance and security gap. Web archives stored in WARC and ARC formats often contain regulated data but remain unscanned and unmanaged, creating a persistent blind spot for traditional DLP and DSPM programs.

How Sentra Scans Web Archives at Scale

We built web archive scanning into Sentra to make this tractable.

Sentra’s WarcReader understands both WARC and ARC formats. It:

  • Processes captured HTTP responses, not just headers
  • Extracts the actual HTML page content and associated resources from each record
  • Normalizes those payloads so they can be scanned just like any other web‑delivered content

Once we’ve pulled out the page content and resources, we run them through the same classification engine we apply to your other data stores, looking for:

  • PII (names, emails, addresses, national IDs, phone numbers, etc.)
  • Financial data (account numbers, card numbers, bank details)
  • Healthcare information and PHI indicators
  • Credentials and other secrets
  • Business‑sensitive data (internal IDs, case numbers, etc.)

Because WARC files can be huge, we do all of this in memory, without unpacking archives to disk. That matters for two reasons:

  1. Performance and scale: We can stream through large archives without creating temporary, unmanaged copies.
  2. Security: We avoid writing decrypted or reconstructed content to local disks, which would create new artifacts you now have to protect.

We also handle embedded resources - images, documents, and other files captured as part of the original pages — so you’re not only seeing what was in the HTML but also what was linked or rendered alongside it. Sentra’s existing file parsers and OCR engine can inspect those nested assets for sensitive content just as they would in any other data store.

Bringing Web Archives into Your DSPM Program

Once you can actually see inside web archives, you can bring them into your data security program instead of pretending they’re “just logs.”

With Sentra, teams can:

  • Discover where web archives live across cloud and on‑prem (S3, Azure Blob, GCS, NFS/SMB shares, and more).
  • Classify the captured content for PII, PCI, PHI, credentials, and business‑sensitive information.
  • Assess regulatory exposure from long‑running archiving programs and legal holds that have accumulated unmanaged PII over time.
  • Support DSAR and deletion workflows that touch archived content, so you can respond to GDPR/CCPA requests with an honest inventory that includes historical web captures.
  • Evaluate scraping and threat‑intel collections to identify sensitive data they were never supposed to capture in the first place (for example, credentials, breach records, or third‑party PII).

In practice, this often leads to concrete actions like:

  • Tightening retention policies on specific archive sets
  • Segmenting or encrypting archives that contain regulated data
  • Updating crawler configurations to avoid collecting sensitive content going forward
  • Aligning privacy teams, legal, and security around a shared understanding of what’s actually in years’ worth of WARC/ARC content

Web Archives Are Data Stores - Treat Them That Way

Web archives aren’t just compliance artifacts, they’re data stores, often holding sensitive and regulated information. Yet in most organizations, WARC and ARC files sit outside the scope of DSPM and data discovery, creating a blind spot between what’s stored and what’s actually secured.

Sentra removes that tradeoff. You can keep the archives you’re required to maintain and gain full visibility into the data inside them. By bringing WARC and ARC files into your DSPM program, you extend coverage to web archives and other hard-to-reach data—without changing how you store or manage them.

Want to see what’s hiding in your web archives? Explore how Sentra scans WARC and ARC files and uncovers sensitive data at scale.

<blogcta-big>

Read More
Nikki Ralston
Nikki Ralston
March 29, 2026
3
Min Read

DLP False Positives Are Drowning Your Security Team: How to Cut Noise with DSPM

DLP False Positives Are Drowning Your Security Team: How to Cut Noise with DSPM

Ask any security engineer how they feel about DLP alerts and you’ll usually get the same reaction. They are drowning in them. Over the last decade, DLP has built a reputation for noisy alerts, rigid rules, and confusing dashboards that bury real risk under a mountain of “maybe” events.

Teams roll out endpoint, email, and network DLP, wire in SaaS connectors, and import standard PCI/PII templates. Within weeks, analysts are triaging hundreds of alerts a day, most of which turn out to be benign. Business users complain that normal work is blocked, so policies get carved up with exceptions or quietly disabled. Meanwhile, the most sensitive data quietly spreads into collaboration tools, cloud storage, and AI workflows that DLP never sees.

The problem is that DLP is being asked to do too much on its own: discover sensitive data, understand its business context, and enforce policies in motion, all from a narrow view of each channel. To fix false positives in a durable way, you have to stop treating DLP as the brain of your data security program and give it an actual data-intelligence layer to work with.

That’s the role of modern Data Security Posture Management (DSPM).

Why Traditional DLP Can Be So Noisy

Most DLP engines still lean heavily on pattern matching and static rules. They look for strings that resemble card numbers, social security numbers, or keywords, and they try to infer “sensitive vs. not” from whatever they can see in a single email, file, or HTTP transaction. That approach might have been tolerable when most sensitive data sat in a few on‑prem systems, but it doesn’t scale to multi‑cloud, SaaS, and AI‑driven environments.

In practice, three things tend to go wrong:

First, DLP rarely has full visibility. Sensitive data now lives in cloud data lakes, SaaS apps, shared drives, ticketing systems, and AI training sets. Many of those locations are either out of reach for traditional DLP or only partially covered.

Second, the rules themselves are crude. A nine‑digit number might be a government ID, or it might be an internal ticket number. A CSV export might be an innocuous test file or a real production dump. Without a shared understanding of what the data actually represents, rules fire on look‑alikes and miss real exposures.

Third, each DLP product, the endpoint agent, the email gateway, the CASB, tries to solve classification locally. You end up with inconsistent detections and competing definitions of “sensitive” that don’t match what the business actually cares about. When you add those up, it’s no surprise that false positives consume so much analyst time and so much political capital with the business.

How DSPM Changes the Equation

DSPM was designed to separate what DLP has been trying to do into dedicated layers. Instead of asking DLP to discover, classify, and enforce all at once, DSPM owns discovery and classification, and DLP focuses on enforcement.

A DSPM platform like Sentra connects directly, via APIs and in‑environment scanning, to your cloud, SaaS, and on‑prem data stores. It builds a unified inventory of data, then uses AI‑driven models and domain‑specific logic to decide:

  • What is this object?
  • How sensitive is it?
  • Which regulations or policies apply?
  • Who or what can currently access it?

From there, DSPM applies consistent labels to that data, often using frameworks like Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MPIP) so labels are understood by other tools. Those labels are then pushed into your DLP stack, SSE/CASB, and email and endpoint controls, so every enforcement point is working from the same definition of sensitivity, instead of guessing on the fly.

Once DLP is enforcing on clear labels and context, rather than raw patterns, you no longer need dozens of almost‑duplicate rules per channel. Policies become simpler and more precise, which is what allows teams to realistically drive false positives down by up to half or more.

A Practical Approach to Cutting DLP Noise

If your security team is exhausted by DLP alerts today, you don’t need another round of regex tuning. You need a change in operating model. A pragmatic sequence looks like this.

Start by measuring the problem instead of just reacting to it. Capture how many DLP alerts you see per week, how many of those are ultimately dismissed, and how much analyst time they consume. Pay special attention to the policies and channels that generate the most noise, because that’s where you’ll see the biggest benefit from a DSPM‑driven approach.

Next, work with DSPM to turn your noisiest rules into label‑driven policies. Instead of “block any message that looks like it contains a card number,” express the rule as “block files labeled PCI sent to personal domains” or “quarantine emails carrying PHI labels to unapproved partners.” Once Sentra or another DSPM platform is reliably applying those labels, DLP simply has to enforce on them.

Then, add business context. The same file can be benign in one context and dangerous in another. Combine labels with identity, role, channel, and basic behavior signals like, time of day, destination, volume, etc., so that only genuinely suspicious events result in hard blocks or escalations. A finance export labeled ‘Confidential’ going to an approved auditor should not be treated the same as that export leaving for an unknown Gmail account at midnight.

Finally, create a feedback loop. Allow analysts to flag alerts as false positives or misconfigurations, and give users controlled ways to override with justification in edge cases. Feed that information back into DSPM tuning and DLP policies at a regular cadence, so your classification and rules get closer to how the business actually operates.

Over time, you’ll find that you write fewer DLP rules, not more. The rules you do have are easier to explain to stakeholders. And most importantly, your analysts spend their time on true positives and meaningful insider‑risk investigations, not on the hundredth low‑value alert of the week.

At that point, you haven’t just made DLP tolerable. You’ve turned it into a quiet, reliable enforcement layer sitting on top of a data‑intelligence foundation.

<blogcta-big>

Read More
Ward Balcerzak
Ward Balcerzak
March 26, 2026
3
Min Read

Best Sensitive Data Discovery Tools in 2026

Best Sensitive Data Discovery Tools in 2026

Sensitive data discovery has become the front door to everything that matters in data security: AI readiness, Microsoft 365 Copilot governance, continuous compliance, and whether your DLP actually works. The days of simply scanning a few databases before an audit are over. Your riskiest information now lives in cloud warehouses, SaaS apps, PDFs, call recordings, and AI pipelines; and most security teams are trying to keep up with tools that were built for a different era.

If you’re evaluating the best sensitive data discovery tools today, you’ll almost certainly encounter Sentra, BigID, Varonis, and Cyera. All four have credibility in the market. Though they are not interchangeable, especially if you care about AI data security, multi‑cloud DSPM, and keeping data inside your own environment.

Below is a comparison that reflects what each platform delivers in 2026, followed by a deeper look at where each one fits and why Sentra is increasingly the default choice for AI‑scale, cloud‑first enterprises.

Side‑by‑Side: Sentra vs BigID vs Varonis vs Cyera

The chart below focuses on the dimensions security and data leaders ask about most often: architecture, coverage, classification quality, AI support, real‑time controls, scale, and fit.

Capability Sentra BigID Varonis Cyera
Architecture & where data lives Cloud-native, agentless platform that scans data in-place across clouds, SaaS, and on-prem. Data never leaves the customer environment; only metadata and findings are processed. Cloud-centric discovery platform with SaaS control plane. Often relies on connectors and moving metadata or samples into its environment for analysis. Built around on-prem collectors and agents. Deploys locally but sends metadata to its platform for analytics. Cloud-native DSPM with agentless approach, but often requires data or metadata to leave the environment for analysis.
Coverage Broadest coverage across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and on-prem, including structured and unstructured data. Very broad connectors across SaaS and data platforms, but depends on configuration. Strong for unstructured and on-prem; cloud and SaaS coverage improving. Good cloud/SaaS coverage but weaker on-prem and structured depth.
Classification quality AI/ML-enhanced with >98% accuracy and deep business context (ownership, sensitivity, purpose). Strong classification but higher false negatives in complex scenarios. Rich classifiers but complex tuning and heavier rescans. Less contextual, higher false positives, more validation required.
AI & Copilot security Purpose-built for AI risks: Copilot readiness, agent inventory, data access mapping, identity-based guardrails. Strong governance via Purview but less unified AI security view. Emerging AI use cases, not core focus. LLM-based validation but limited visibility into AI data movement.
DSPM + DAG + DDR Unified platform combining posture, access governance, and detection/response in real time. Strong discovery and privacy workflows; relies on integrations for detection. Very strong DAG for permissions, limited DDR for cloud threats. DSPM-focused; no native DDR and limited real-time threat linkage.
Time to value Fast agentless deployment; insights day one, full coverage in days. Heavier setup with connectors and integrations. Long deployment cycles due to agents and integrations. Quick start but slower full inventory at scale.
Scale & cost Petabyte-scale efficiency; scans tens of PB in days with very low cost. Predictable pricing but higher compute cost at scale. Higher operational cost at large scale. Scales but with higher resource consumption and cost.
Best fit Large cloud-first enterprises needing unified DSPM, DAG, DDR and AI governance. Organizations prioritizing privacy workflows and Microsoft ecosystem. Enterprises focused on on-prem file security and permissions. Cloud-native DSPM use cases with narrower scope.

How to Read This Chart (Without the Hype)

All four of these tools can legitimately call themselves sensitive data discovery platforms:

  • Sentra is built as a cloud‑native DSPM + DAG + DDR platform that keeps data in your environment, with strong AI data readiness and copilot coverage.
  • BigID is often chosen for privacy, DSAR, and broad connector needs, especially in Microsoft‑heavy environments.
  • Varonis remains a heavyweight for on‑prem file servers and unstructured data with deep permission analytics.
  • Cyera focuses on cloud‑native DSPM with agentless posture scanning and some AI‑driven validation.

Where they diverge is in how far they go beyond “finding data”:

  • Some stop at discovery and classification, leaving access, AI governance, and response to other tools.
  • Others focus on specific environments (for example, on‑prem files or S3‑only) and leave gaps in SaaS, AI pipelines, or PDFs, audio, and video.
  • Only a Sentra offers in‑place, multi‑cloud coverage with continuous DSPM, DAG, and DDR at truly large scale.

That’s the lens where Sentra consistently looks strongest, especially if you’re already piloting or rolling out M365 Copilot and other GenAI assistants or have petabytes of regulated data across multi-cloud and hybrid infrastructure.

Why Sentra Is the Best Fit for AI‑Scale, Multi‑Cloud Discovery

Senra emerges as a clear leader because tt is designed for organizations that:

A few traits make Sentra stand out:

Everything is in‑place and agentless.
Discovery and classification run inside your cloud accounts and data centers using APIs and serverless scanners. Sensitive data isn’t copied into a vendor environment for processing, and scanning doesn’t depend on a forest of agents. That’s both a security benefit and a deployment advantage.

Sentra understands the data and the business around it.
Sentra’s AI classifier doesn’t stop at matching patterns. It delivers >98% accuracy across structured and unstructured data, and it attaches rich business context: which department owns the data, where it resides geographically, whether it’s synthetic or real, and what role it plays in the business. That context directly drives risk scoring, prioritization, and automated remediation.

Sentra treats audio, video, and PDFs as first‑class data sources.
Sentra scans dozens of audio and video formats by extracting and transcribing audio with ML models, then running the same classifiers used for text. It also parses complex PDFs, runs OCR on scanned pages, and inspects metadata - all inside your cloud. That closes some of the biggest blind spots in legacy DLP and discovery tools.

Sentra scales to petabytes without breaking the bank.
Internal and customer bake‑offs show Sentra scanning 9 PB in under 72 hours, with the architecture designed to cover hundreds of petabytes in days and deliver around 10x lower scan cost than older approaches. That makes continuous discovery and re‑scanning feasible instead of a once‑a‑year luxury.

Sentra unifies DSPM, DAG, and DDR.
Instead of scattering posture, access, and detection across separate siloed tools, Sentra ties them together. It shows you where sensitive data is, who or what can access it, how it’s being used, and what needs to happen next - from revoking access to applying labels or opening tickets - in one place.

So Which “Best Sensitive Data Discovery Tool” Should You Choose?

If you are primarily focused on:

  • Privacy and DSAR workflows with deep governance in a Microsoft‑centric stack, BigID will be on your shortlist.
  • On‑prem file security and permissions analytics for legacy environments, Varonis still deserves serious consideration.
  • Cloud‑only DSPM posture checks with agentless deployment and LLM‑augmented validation, Cyera may be attractive in narrower, less regulated scenarios.

But if you need a single, AI‑ready data security platform that:

  • Discovers and classifies sensitive data across multi‑cloud, SaaS, and on‑prem,
  • Keeps data inside your environment while doing it,
  • Powers DSPM, DAG, DDR, M365 Copilot governance, and DLP from one consistent data‑context layer, and
  • Scales to petabytes without turning each scan into a budgeting exercise,

Then Sentra is, in practice, the best‑fit choice among today’s leading sensitive data discovery tools.

<blogcta-big>

Read More
Expert Data Security Insights Straight to Your Inbox
What Should I Do Now:
1

Get the latest GigaOm DSPM Radar report - see why Sentra was named a Leader and Fast Mover in data security. Download now and stay ahead on securing sensitive data.

2

Sign up for a demo and learn how Sentra’s data security platform can uncover hidden risks, simplify compliance, and safeguard your sensitive data.

3

Follow us on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and YouTube for actionable expert insights on how to strengthen your data security, build a successful DSPM program, and more!

Before you go...

Get the Gartner Customers' Choice for DSPM Report

Read why 98% of users recommend Sentra.

White Gartner Peer Insights Customers' Choice 2025 badge with laurel leaves inside a speech bubble.