In this article:

This is some text inside of a div block.

Share the Article

What is Sensitive Data Exposure and How to Prevent It

January 1, 2024

Min Read

Data Security

Ron Reiter

Co-Founder and CTO

What is Sensitive Data Exposure?

Sensitive data exposure occurs when security measures fail to protect sensitive information from external and internal threats. This leads to unauthorized disclosure of private and confidential data. Attackers often target personal data, such as financial information and healthcare records, as it is valuable and exploitable.

Security teams play a critical role in mitigating sensitive data exposures. They do this by implementing robust security measures. This includes eliminating malicious software, enforcing strong encryption standards, and enhancing access controls. Yet, even with the most sophisticated security measures in place, data breaches can still occur. They often happen through the weakest links in the system.

Organizations must focus on proactive measures to prevent data exposures. They should also put in place responsive strategies to effectively address breaches. By combining proactive and responsive measures, as stated below, organizations can protect sensitive data exposure. They can also maintain the trust of their customers.

‍

Proactive Measures	Responsive Strategies
Implementation of appropriate security posture controls for sensitive data, such as encryption, data masking, de-identification, etc.	Security audits with patch management ensure the masking of affected data to minimize the attack surface and eradicate threats.
Sensitive data access restrictions through least privilege principles enforcement.	Promptly identifying and reacting through incident response systems with adequate alerting.
Enablement of comprehensive logging mechanisms to capture and monitor activities on sensitive data.	Investigating the root cause of the breach to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
Alignment with cyber protection regulations and compliance requirements through adherence to strict cyber policies.	Implementing additional custom security measures to strengthen the overall security posture.

Difference Between Data Exposure and Data Breach

Both data exposure and data breaches involve unauthorized access or disclosure of sensitive information. However, they differ in their intent and the underlying circumstances.

Data Exposure

Data exposure occurs when sensitive information is inadvertently disclosed or made accessible to unauthorized individuals or entities. This exposure can happen due to various factors. These include misconfigured systems, human error, or inadequate security measures. Data exposure is typically unintentional. The exposed data may not be actively targeted or exploited.

Data Breach

A data breach, on the other hand, is a deliberate act of unauthorized access to sensitive information with the intent to steal, manipulate, or exploit it. Data breaches are often carried out by cybercriminals or malicious actors seeking financial gain, identity theft, or to disrupt an organization's operations.

Key Differences

The table below summarizes the key differences between sensitive data exposure and data breaches:

‍

Features	Data Exposure	Data Breach
Intent	Unintentional	Intentional
Underlying Factor	Human error, misconfigured systems, inadequate security	Deliberate attacks by cybercriminals or malicious actors
Impact	Can still lead to privacy violations and reputational damage	Often more severe impacts, including fraud and financial losses, identity theft, and disruption of operations
Solutions	Following security best practices, continuous monitoring and SecOps literacy	Robust security measures with discrete monitoring and alerting for anomaly detection and remediation

Types of Sensitive Data Exposure

Attackers relentlessly pursue sensitive data. They create increasingly sophisticated and inventive methods to breach security systems and compromise valuable information. Their motives range from financial gain to disruption of operations. Ultimately, this causes harm to individuals and organizations alike. There are three main types of data breaches that can compromise sensitive information:

Availability Breach

An availability breach occurs when authorized users are temporarily or permanently denied access to sensitive data. Ransomware commonly uses this method to extort organizations. Such disruptions can impede business operations and hinder essential services. They can also result in financial losses. Addressing and mitigating these breaches is essential to ensure uninterrupted access and business continuity.

Confidentiality Breach

A confidentiality breach occurs when unauthorized entities access sensitive data, infringing upon its privacy and confidentiality. The consequences can be severe. They can include financial fraud, identity theft, reputational harm, and legal repercussions. It's crucial to maintain strong security measures. Doing so prevents breaches and preserves sensitive information's integrity.

Integrity Breach

An integrity breach occurs when unauthorized individuals or entities alter or modify sensitive data. AI LLM training is particularly vulnerable to this breach form. This compromises the data's accuracy and reliability. This manipulation of data can result in misinformation, financial losses, and diminished trust in data quality. Vigilant measures are essential to protect data integrity. They also help reduce the impact of breaches.

How Sensitive Data Gets Exposed

Sensitive data, including vital information like Personally Identifiable Information (PII), financial records, and healthcare data, forms the backbone of contemporary organizations. Unfortunately, weak encryption, unreliable application programming interfaces, and insufficient security practices from development and security teams can jeopardize this invaluable data. Such lapses lead to critical vulnerabilities, exposing sensitive data at three crucial points:

Data in Transit

Data in transit refers to the transfer of data between locations, such as from a user's device to a server or between servers. This data is a prime target for attackers due to its often unencrypted state, making it vulnerable to interception. Key factors contributing to data exposure in transit include weak encryption, insecure protocols, and the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks. It is crucial to address these vulnerabilities to enhance the security of data during transit.

Data at Rest

While data at rest is less susceptible to interception than data in transit, it remains vulnerable to attacks. Enterprises commonly face internal exposure to sensitive data when they have misconfigurations or insufficient access controls on data at rest. Oversharing and insufficient access restrictions heighten the risk in data lakes and warehouses that house Personally Identifiable Information (PII). To mitigate this risk, it is important to implement robust access controls and monitoring measures. This ensures restricted access and vigilant tracking of data access patterns.

Data in Use

Data in use is the most vulnerable to attack, as it is often unencrypted and can be accessed by multiple users and applications. When working in cloud computing environments, dev teams usually gather the data and cache it within the mounts or in-memory to boost performance and reduce I/O. Such data causes sensitive data exposure vulnerabilities as other teams or cloud providers can access the data. The security teams need to adopt standard data handling practices. For example, they should clean the data from third-party or cloud mounts after use and disable caching.

What Causes Sensitive Data Exposure?

Sensitive data exposure results from a combination of internal and external factors. Internally, DevSecOps and Business Analytics teams play a significant role in unintentional data exposures. External threats usually come from hackers and malicious actors. Mitigating these risks requires a comprehensive approach to safeguarding data integrity and maintaining a resilient security posture.

Internal Causes of Sensitive Data Exposure

No or Weak Encryption: Encryption and decryption algorithms are the keys to safeguarding data. Sensitive data exposures occur due to weak cryptography protocols. They also occur due to a lack of encryption or hashing mechanisms.
Insecure Passwords: Insecure password practices and insufficient validation checks compromise enterprise security, facilitating data exposure.
Unsecured Web Pages: JSON payloads get delivered from web servers to frontend API handlers. Attackers can easily exploit the data transaction between the server and client when users browse unsecure web pages with weak SSL and TLS certificates.
Poor Access Controls and Misconfigurations: Insufficient multi-factor authentication (MFA) or excessive permissioning and unreliable security posture management contribute to sensitive data exposure through misconfigurations.
Insider Threat Attacks: Current or former employees may unintentionally or intentionally target data, posing risks to organizational security and integrity.

External Causes of Sensitive Data Exposure

SQL Injection: SQL Injection happens when attackers introduce malicious queries and SQL blocks into server requests. This lets them tamper with backend queries to retrieve or alter data, causing SQL injection attacks.
Network Compromise: A network compromise occurs when unauthorized users gain control of backend services or servers. This compromises network integrity, risking resource theft or data alteration.
Phishing Attacks: Phishing attacks contain malicious links. They exploit urgency, tricking recipients into disclosing sensitive information like login credentials or personal details.
Supply Chain Attacks: When compromised, Third-party service providers or vendors exploit the dependent systems and unintentionally expose sensitive data publicly.

Impact of Sensitive Data Exposure

Exposing sensitive data poses significant risks. It encompasses private details like health records, user credentials, and biometric data. Accountability, governed by acts like the Accountability Act, mandates organizations to safeguard granular user information. Failure to prevent unauthorized exposure can result in severe consequences. This can include identity theft and compromised user privacy. It can also lead to regulatory and legal repercussions and potential corruption of databases and infrastructure. Organizations must focus on stringent measures to mitigate these risks.

Examples of Sensitive Data Exposure

Prominent companies, including Atlassian, LinkedIn, and Dubsmash, have unfortunately become notable examples of sensitive data exposure incidents. Analyzing these cases provides insights into the causes and repercussions of such data exposure. It offers valuable lessons for enhancing data security measures.

Atlassian Jira (2019)

In 2019, Atlassian Jira, a project management tool, experienced significant data exposure. The exposure resulted from a configuration error. A misconfiguration in global permission settings allowed unauthorized access to sensitive information. This included names, email addresses, project details, and assignee data. The issue originated from incorrect permissions granted during the setup of filters and dashboards in JIRA.

LinkedIn (2021)

LinkedIn, a widely used professional social media platform, experienced a data breach where approximately 92% of user data was extracted through web scraping. The security incident was attributed to insufficient webpage protection and the absence of effective mechanisms to prevent web crawling activity.

Equifax (2017)

In 2017, Equifax Ltd., the UK affiliate of credit reporting company Equifax Inc., faced a significant data breach. Hackers infiltrated Equifax servers in the US, impacting over 147 million individuals, including 13.8 million UK users. Equifax failed to meet security obligations. It outsourced security management to its US parent company. This led to the exposure of sensitive data such as names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, Equifax membership login credentials, and partial credit card information.

Cost of Compliance Fines

Data exposure poses significant risks, whether at rest or in transit. Attackers target various dimensions of sensitive information. This includes protected health data, biometrics for AI systems, and personally identifiable information (PII). Compliance costs are subject to multiple factors influenced by shifting regulatory landscapes. This is true regardless of the stage.

Enterprises failing to safeguard data face substantial monetary fines or imprisonment. The penalty depends on the impact of the exposure. Fines can range from millions to billions, and compliance costs involve valuable resources and time. Thus, safeguarding sensitive data is imperative for mitigating reputation loss and upholding industry standards.

How to Determine if You Are Vulnerable to Sensitive Data Exposure?

Detecting security vulnerabilities in the vast array of threats to sensitive data is a challenging task. Unauthorized access often occurs due to lax data classification and insufficient access controls. Enterprises must adopt additional measures to assess their vulnerability to data exposure.

Deep scans, validating access levels, and implementing robust monitoring are crucial steps. Detecting unusual access patterns is crucial. In addition, using advanced reporting systems to swiftly detect anomalies and take preventive measures in case of a breach is an effective strategy. It proactively safeguards sensitive data.

Automation is key as well - to allow burdened security teams the ability to keep pace with dynamic cloud use and data proliferation. Automating discovery and classification, freeing up resources, and doing so in a highly autonomous manner without requiring huge setup and configuration efforts can greatly help.

How to Prevent Sensitive Data Exposure

Effectively managing sensitive data demands rigorous preventive measures to avert exposure. Widely embraced as best practices, these measures serve as a strategic shield against breaches. The following points focus on specific areas of vulnerability. They offer practical solutions to either eliminate potential sensitive data exposures or promptly respond to them:

Assess Risks Associated with Data

The initial stages of data and access onboarding serve as gateways to potential exposure. Conducting a thorough assessment, continual change monitoring, and implementing stringent access controls for critical assets significantly reduces the risks of sensitive data exposure. This proactive approach marks the first step to achieving a strong data security posture.

Minimize Data Surface Area

Overprovisioning and excessive sharing create complexities. This turns issue isolation, monitoring, and maintenance into challenges. Without strong security controls, every part of the environment, platform, resources, and data transactions poses security risks. Opting for a less-is-more approach is ideal. This is particularly true when dealing with sensitive information like protected health data and user credentials. By minimizing your data attack surface, you mitigate the risk of cloud data leaks.

Store Passwords Using Salted Hashing Functions and Leverage MFA

Securing databases, portals, and services hinges on safeguarding passwords. This prevents unauthorized access to sensitive data. It is crucial to handle password protection and storage with precision. Use advanced hashing algorithms for encryption and decryption. Adding an extra layer of security through multi-factor authentication strengthens the defense against potential breaches even more.

Disable Autocomplete and Caching

Cached data poses significant vulnerabilities and risks of data breaches. Enterprises often use auto-complete features, requiring the storage of data on local devices for convenient access. Common instances include passwords stored in browser sessions and cache. In cloud environments, attackers exploit computing instances. They access sensitive cloud data by exploiting instances where data caching occurs. Mitigating these risks involves disabling caching and auto-complete features in applications. This effectively prevents potential security threats.

Fast and Effective Breach Response

Instances of personal data exposure stemming from threats like man-in-the-middle and SQL injection attacks necessitate swift and decisive action. External data exposure carries a heightened impact compared to internal incidents. Combatting data breaches demands a responsive approach. It's often facilitated by widely adopted strategies. These include Data Detection and Response (DDR), Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR), User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA), and the renowned Zero Trust Architecture featuring Predictive Analytics (ZTPA).

Tools to Prevent Sensitive Data Exposure

Shielding sensitive information demands a dual approach—internally and externally. Unauthorized access can be prevented through vigilant monitoring, diligent analysis, and swift notifications to both security teams and affected users. Effective tools, whether in-house or third-party, are indispensable in preventing data exposure.

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) is designed to meet the changing requirements of security, ensuring a thorough and meticulous approach to protecting sensitive data. Tools compliant with DSPM standards usually feature data tokenization and masking, seamlessly integrated into their services. This ensures that data transmission and sharing remains secure.

‍

These tools also often have advanced security features. Examples include detailed access controls, specific access patterns, behavioral analysis, and comprehensive logging and monitoring systems. These features are essential for identifying and providing immediate alerts about any unusual activities or anomalies.

Sentra emerges as an optimal solution, boasting sophisticated data discovery and classification capabilities. It continuously evaluates data security controls and issues automated notifications. This addresses critical data vulnerabilities ingrained in its core.

Conclusion

In the era of cloud transformation and digital adoption, data emerges as the driving force behind innovations. Personal Identifiable Information (PII), which is a specific type of sensitive data, is crucial for organizations to deliver personalized offerings that cater to user preferences. The value inherent in data, both monetarily and personally, places it at the forefront, and attackers continually seek opportunities to exploit enterprise missteps.

‍

Failure to adopt secure access and standard security controls by data-holding enterprises can lead to sensitive data exposure. Unaddressed, this vulnerability becomes a breeding ground for data breaches and system compromises. Elevating enterprise security involves implementing data security posture management and deploying robust security controls. Advanced tools with built-in data discovery and classification capabilities are essential to this success. Stringent security protocols fortify the tools, safeguarding data against vulnerabilities and ensuring the resilience of business operations.

‍

If you want to learn more about how you can prevent sensitive data exposure, request a demo with our data security experts today.

‍

Ron Reiter

Co-Founder and CTO

Discover Ron’s expertise, shaped by over 20 years of hands-on tech and leadership experience in cybersecurity, cloud, big data, and machine learning. As a serial entrepreneur and seed investor, Ron has contributed to the success of several startups, including Axonius, Firefly, Guardio, Talon Cyber Security, and Lightricks, after founding a company acquired by Oracle.

Latest Blog Posts

Yair Cohen

January 28, 2025

Min Read

Data Security

Data Protection and Classification in Microsoft 365

Imagine the fallout of a single misstep—a phishing scam tricking an employee into sharing sensitive data. The breach doesn’t just compromise information; it shakes trust, tarnishes reputations, and invites compliance penalties. With data breaches on the rise, safeguarding your organization’s Microsoft 365 environment has never been more critical.

‍

Data classification helps prevent such disasters. This article provides a clear roadmap for protecting and classifying Microsoft 365 data. It explores how data is saved and classified, discusses built-in tools for protection, and covers best practices for maintaining Microsoft 365 data protection.

‍

How Is Data Saved and Classified in Microsoft 365?

‍

Microsoft 365 stores data across tools and services. For example, emails are stored in Exchange Online, while documents and data for collaboration are found in Sharepoint and Teams, and documents or files for individual users are stored in OneDrive. This data is primarily unstructured—a format ideal for documents and images but challenging for identifying sensitive information.

‍

All of this data is largely stored in an unstructured format typically used for documents and images. This format not only allows organizations to store large volumes of data efficiently; it also enables seamless collaboration across teams and departments. However, as unstructured data cannot be neatly categorized into tables or columns, it becomes cumbersome to discern what data is sensitive and where it is stored.

‍

To address this, Microsoft 365 offers a data classification dashboard that helps classify data of varying levels of sensitivity and data governed by different regulatory compliance frameworks. But how does Microsoft identify sensitive information with unstructured data?

‍

Microsoft employs advanced technologies such as RegEx scans, trainable classifiers, Bloom filters, and data classification graphs to identify and classify data as public, internal, or confidential. Once classified, data protection and governance policies are applied based on sensitivity and retention labels.

‍

Data classification is vital for understanding, protecting, and governing data. With your Microsoft 365 data classified appropriately, you can ensure seamless collaboration without risking data exposure.

Figure 1: Why data classification is important

Microsoft 365 Data Protection and Classification Tools

Microsoft 365 includes several key tools and frameworks for classifying and securing data. Here are a few.

Microsoft Purview

Microsoft Purview is a cornerstone of data classification and protection within Microsoft 365.

‍

Key Features:

Over 200+ prebuilt classifiers and the ability to create custom classifiers tailored to specific business needs.
Purview auto-classifies data across Microsoft 365 and other supported apps, such as Adobe Photoshop and Adobe PDF, while users work on them.
Sensitivity labels that apply encryption, watermarks, and access restrictions to secure sensitive data.‍
Double Key Encryption to ensure that sensitivity labels persist even when file formats change.
‍

Sensitivity watermarks in M365 — Figure 2: Sensitivity watermarks in Microsoft 365 (Source: Microsoft)

Figure 3: Sensitivity labels for information protection policies in Microsoft 365 (Source: Microsoft)

‍

Purview autonomously applies sensitivity labels like "confidential" or "highly confidential" based on preconfigured policies, ensuring optimal access control. These labels persist even when files are shared or converted to other formats, such as from Word to PDF.

‍

Additionally, Purview’s data loss prevention (DLP) policies prevent unauthorized sharing or deletion of sensitive data by flagging and reporting violations in real time. For example, if a sensitive file is shared externally, Purview can immediately block the transfer and alert your security team.

Sensitivity labeling for announcements in M365 — Figure 4: Preventing data loss by using sensitivity labels (Source: Microsoft)

Microsoft Defender

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps strengthens security by providing a cloud app discovery window to identify applications accessing data. Once identified, it classifies files within these applications based on sensitivity, applying appropriate protections as per preconfigured policies.

‍

Key Features:

Data Sensitivity Classification: Defender identifies sensitive files and assigns protection based on sensitivity levels, ensuring compliance and reducing risk. For example, it labels files containing credit card numbers, personal identifiers, or confidential business information with sensitivity classifications like "Highly Confidential."
Threat Detection and Response: Defender detects known threats targeted at sensitive data in emails, collaboration tools (like SharePoint and Teams), URLs, file attachments, and OneDrive. If an admin account is compromised, Microsoft Defender immediately spots the threat, disables the account, and notifies your IT team to prevent significant damage.‍
Automation: Defender automates incident response, ensuring that malicious activities are flagged and remediated promptly.

Intune

Microsoft Intune provides comprehensive device management and data protection, enabling organizations to enforce policies that safeguard sensitive information on both managed and unmanaged smartphones, computers, and other devices.

‍

Key Features:

Customizable Compliance Policies: Intune allows organizations to enforce device compliance policies that align with internal and regulatory standards. For example, it can block non-compliant devices from accessing sensitive data until issues are resolved.
Data Access Control: Intune disallows employees from accessing corporate data on compromised devices or through insecure apps, such as those not using encryption for emails.‍
Endpoint Security Management: By integrating with Microsoft Defender, Intune provides endpoint protection and automated responses to detected threats, ensuring only secure devices can access your organization’s network.

Endpoint security overview — Figure 6: Intune device management portal (Source: Microsoft)

‍

Intune supports organizations by enabling the creation and enforcement of device compliance policies tailored to both internal and regulatory standards. These policies detect non-compliant devices, issue alerts, and restrict access to sensitive data until compliance is restored. Conditional access ensures that only secure and compliant devices connect to your network.

‍

Microsoft 365-managed apps like Outlook, Word, and Excel. These policies define which apps can access specific data, such as emails, and regulate permissible actions, including copying, pasting, forwarding, and taking screenshots. This layered security approach safeguards critical information while maintaining seamless app functionality.

Does Microsoft have a DLP Solution?

Microsoft 365’s data loss prevention (DLP) policies represent the implementation of the zero-trust framework. These policies aim to prevent oversharing, accidental deletion, and data leaks across Microsoft 365 services, including Exchange Online, SharePoint, Teams, and OneDrive, as well as Windows and macOS devices.

‍

Retention policies, deployed via retention labels, help organizations manage the data lifecycle effectively.These labels ensure that data is retained only as long as necessary to meet compliance requirements, reducing the risks associated with prolonged data storage.

Figure 7: How DLP policies work (Source: Microsoft)

What is the Microsoft 365 Compliance Center?

The Microsoft 365 compliance center offers tools to manage policies and monitor data access, ensuring adherence to regulations. For example, DLP policies allow organizations to define specific automated responses when certain regulatory requirements—like GDPR or HIPAA—are violated.

‍

Microsoft Purview Compliance Portal: This portal ensures sensitive data is classified, stored, retained, and used in adherence to relevant compliance regulations. Meanwhile, Microsoft 365’s MPIP ensures that only authorized users can access sensitive information, whether collaborating on Teams or sharing files in SharePoint. Together, these tools enable secure collaboration while keeping regulatory compliance at the forefront.

‍

12 Best Practices for Microsoft 365 Data Protection and Classification

To achieve effective Microsoft 365 data protection and classification, organizations should follow these steps:

Create precise labels, tags, and classification policies; don’t rely solely on prebuilt labels and policies, as definitions of sensitive data may vary by context.
Automate labeling to minimize errors and quickly capture new datasets.
Establish and enforce data use policies and guardrails automatically to reduce risks of data breaches, compliance failures, and insider threat risks.
Regularly review and update data classification and usage policies to reflect evolving threats, new data storage, and changing compliance laws.o policies must stay up to date to remain effective.
Define context-appropriate DLP policies based on your business needs; factoring in remote work, ease of collaboration, regional compliance standards, etc.
Apply encryption to safeguard data inside and outside your organization.
Enforce role-based access controls (RBAC) and least privilege principles to ensure users only have access to data and can perform actions within the scope of their roles. This limits the risk of accidental data exposure, deletion, and cyberattacks.
Create audit trails of user activity around data and maintain version histories to prevent and track data loss.
Follow the 3-2-1 backup rule: keep three copies of your data, store two on different media, and one offsite.
Leverage the full suite of Microsoft 365 tools to monitor sensitive data, detect real-time threats, and secure information effectively.
Promptly resolve detected risks to mitigate attacks early.
Ensure data protection and classification policies do not impede collaboration to prevent teams from creating shadow data, which puts your organization at risk of data breaches.

For example, consider #3. If a disgruntled employee starts transferring sensitive intellectual property to external devices in preparation for a ransomware attack, having the right data use policies in place will allow your organization to stop the threat before it escalates.

Microsoft 365 Data Protection and Classification Limitations

Despite Microsoft 365’s array of tools, there are some key gaps. AI/ML-powered data security posture management (DSPM) and data detection and response (DDR) solutions fill these easily.

‍

The top limitations of Microsoft 365 data protection and classification are the following:

Limitations Handling Large Volumes of Unstructured Data: Purview struggles to automatically classify and apply sensitivity labels to diverse and vast datasets, particularly in Azure services or non-Microsoft clouds.
Contextless Data Classification: Without considering context, Microsoft Purview’s MPIP can lead to false positives (over-labeling non-sensitive data) or false negatives (missing sensitive data).
Inconsistent Labeling Across Providers: Microsoft tools are limited to its ecosystem, making it difficult for enterprises using multi-cloud environments to enforce consistent organization-wide labeling.
Minimal Threat Response Capabilities: Microsoft Defender relies heavily on IT teams for remediation and lacks robust autonomous responses.
Sporadic Interruption of User Activity: Inaccurate DLP classifications can disrupt legitimate data transfers in collaboration channels, frustrating employees and increasing the risk of shadow IT workarounds.

Sentra Fills the Gap: Protection Measures to Address Microsoft 365 Data Risks

Today’s businesses must get ahead of data risks by instituting Microsoft 365 data protection and classification best practices such as least privilege access and encryption. Otherwise, they risk data exposure, damaging cyberattacks, and hefty compliance fines. However, implementing these best practices depends on accurate and context-sensitive data classification in Microsoft 365.

‍

Sentra’s Cloud-native Data Security Platform enables secure collaboration and file sharing across all Microsoft 365 services including SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, OneNote, Office, Word, Excel, and more. Sentra provides data access governance, shadow data detection, and privacy audit automation for M365 data. It also evaluates risks and alerts for policy or regulatory violations.

‍

Specifically, Sentra complements Purview in the following ways:

Sentra Data Detection & Response (DDR): Continuously monitors for threats such as data exfiltration, weakening of data security posture, and other suspicious activities in real time. While Purview Insider Risk Management focuses on M365 applications, Sentra DDR extends these capabilities to Azure and non-Microsoft applications.
Data Perimeter Protection: Sentra automatically detects and identifies an organization’s data perimeters across M365, Azure, and non-Microsoft clouds. It alerts “organizations when sensitive data leaves its boundaries, regardless of how it is copied or exported.
Shadow Data Reduction: Using context-based analysis powered by Sentra’s DataTreks™, the platform identifies unnecessary shadow data, reducing the attack surface and improving data governance.
Training Data Monitoring: Sentra monitors training datasets continuously, identifying privacy violations of sensitive PII or real-time threats like training data poisoning or suspicious access.
Data Access Governance: Sentra adds to Purview’s data catalog by including metadata on users and applications with data access permissions, ensuring better governance.
Automated Privacy Assessments: Sentra automates privacy evaluations aligned with frameworks like GDPR and CCPA, seamlessly integrating them into Purview’s data catalog.
Rich Contextual Insights: Sentra delivers detailed data context to understand usage, sensitivity, movement, and unique data types. These insights enable precise risk evaluation, threat prioritization, and remediation, and they can be consumed via an API by DLP systems, SIEMs, and other tools.

‍

By addressing these gaps, Sentra empowers organizations to enhance their Microsoft 365 data protection and classification strategies. Request a demo to experience Sentra’s innovative solutions firsthand.

Team Sentra

December 26, 2024

Min Read

Data Security

Create an Effective RFP for a Data Security Platform & DSPM

This RFP Guide is designed to help organizations create their own RFP for selection of Cloud-native Data Security Platform (DSP) & Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) solutions. The purpose is to identify key essential requirements that will enable effective discovery, classification, and protection of sensitive data across complex environments, including in public cloud infrastructures and in on-premises environments.

Instructions for Vendors

Each section provides essential and recommended requirements to achieve a best practice capability. These have been accumulated over dozens of customer implementations. Customers may also wish to include their own unique requirements specific to their industry or data environment.

1. Data Discovery & Classification

‍

Requirement	Details
Shadow Data Detection	Can the solution discover and identify shadow data across any data environment (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, OnPrem)?
Sensitive Data Classification	Can the solution accurately classify sensitive data, including PII, financial data, and healthcare data?
Efficient Scanning	Does the solution support smart sampling of large file shares and data lakes to reduce and optimize the cost of scanning, yet provide full scan coverage in less time and lower cloud compute costs?
AI-based Classification	Does the solution leverage AI/ML to classify data in unstructured documents and stores (Google Drive, OneDrive, SharePoint, etc) and achieve more than 95% accuracy?
Data Context	Can the solution discern and ‘learn’ the business purpose (employee data, customer data, identifiable data subjects, legal data, synthetic data, etc.) of data elements and tag them accordingly?
Data Store Compatibility	Which data stores (e.g., AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure SQL, Snowflake data warehouse, On Premises file shares, etc.) does the solution support for discovery?
Autonomous Discovery	Can the solution discover sensitive data automatically and continuously, ensuring up to date awareness of data presence?
Data Perimeters Monitoring	Can the solution track data movement between storage solutions and detect risky and non-compliant data transfers and data sprawl?

‍

2. Data Access Governance

Requirement	Details
Access Controls	Does the solution map access of users and non-human identities to data based on sensitivity and sensitive information types?
Location Independent Control	Does the solution help organizations apply least privilege access regardless of data location or movement?
Identity Activity Monitoring	Does the solution identify over-provisioned, unused or abandoned identities (users, keys, secrets) that create unnecessary exposures?
Data Access Catalog	Does the solution provide an intuitive map of identities, their access entitlements (read/write permissions), and the sensitive data they can access?
Integration with IAM Providers	Does the solution integrate with existing Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems?

‍

3. Posture, Risk Assessment & Threat Monitoring

‍

Requirement	Details
Risk Assessment	Can the solution assess data security risks and assign risk scores based on data exposure and data sensitivity?
Compliance Frameworks	Does the solution support compliance with regulatory requirements such as GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA?
Similar Data Detection	Does the solution identify data that has been copied, moved, transformed or otherwise modified that may disguise its sensitivity or lessen its security posture?
Automated Alerts	Does the solution provide automated alerts for policy violations and potential data breaches?
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)	Does the solution include DLP features to prevent unauthorized data exfiltration?
3rd Party Data Loss Prevention (DLP)	Does the solution integrate with 3rd party DLP solutions?
User Behavior Monitoring	Does the solution track and analyze user behaviors to identify potential insider threats or malicious activity?
Anomaly Detection	Does the solution establish a baseline and use machine learning or AI to detect anomalies in data access or movement?

‍

4. Incident Response & Remediation

Requirement	Details
Incident Management	Can the solution provide detailed reports, alert details, and activity/change history logs for incident investigation?
Automated Response	Does the solution support automated incident response, such as blocking malicious users or stopping unauthorized data flows (via API integration to native cloud tools or other)?
Forensic Capabilities	Can the solution facilitate forensic investigation, such as data access trails and root cause analysis?
Integration with SIEM	Can the solution integrate with existing Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) or other analysis systems?

‍

5. Infrastructure & Deployment

‍

Requirement	Details
Deployment Models	Does the solution support flexible deployment models (on-premise, cloud, hybrid)? Is the solution agentless?
Cloud Native	Does the solution keep all data in the customer’s environment, performing classification via serverless functions? (ie. no data is ever removed from customer environment - only metadata)
Scalability	Can the solution scale to meet the demands of large enterprises with multi-petabyte data volumes?
Performance Impact	Does the solution work asynchronously without performance impact on the data production environment?
Multi-Cloud Support	Does the solution provide unified visibility and management across multiple cloud providers and hybrid environments?

‍

6. Operations & Support

‍

Requirement	Details
Onboarding	Does the solution vendor assist customers with onboarding? Does this include assistance with customization of policies, classifiers, or other settings?
24/7 Support	Does the vendor provide 24/7 support for addressing urgent security issues?
Training & Documentation	Does the vendor provide training and detailed documentation for implementation and operation?
Managed Services	Does the vendor (or its partners) offer managed services for organizations without dedicated security teams?
Integration with Security Tools	Can the solution integrate with existing security tools, such as firewalls, DLP systems, and endpoint protection systems?

‍

7. Pricing & Licensing

‍

Requirement	Details
Pricing Model	What is the pricing structure (e.g., per user, per GB, per endpoint)?
Licensing	What licensing options are available (e.g., subscription, perpetual)?
Additional Costs	Are there additional costs for support, maintenance, or feature upgrades?

‍

Conclusion

This RFP template is designed to facilitate a structured and efficient evaluation of DSP and DSPM solutions. Vendors are encouraged to provide comprehensive and transparent responses to ensure an accurate assessment of their solution’s capabilities.

‍

Sentra’s cloud-native design combines powerful Data Discovery and Classification, DSPM, DAG, and DDR capabilities into a complete Data Security Platform (DSP). With this, Sentra customers achieve enterprise-scale data protection and do so very efficiently - without creating undue burdens on the personnel who must manage it.

‍

To learn more about Sentra’s DSP, request a demo here and choose a time for a meeting with our data security experts. You can also choose to download the RFP as a pdf.

Gilad Golani

December 16, 2024

Min Read

Data Security

Best Practices: Automatically Tag and Label Sensitive Data

The Importance of Data Labeling and Tagging

In today's fast-paced business environment, data rarely stays in one place. It moves across devices, applications, and services as individuals collaborate with internal teams and external partners. This mobility is essential for productivity but poses a challenge: how can you ensure your data remains secure and compliant with business and regulatory requirements when it's constantly on the move?

Why Labeling and Tagging Data Matters

Data labeling and tagging provide a critical solution to this challenge. By assigning sensitivity labels to your data, you can define its importance and security level within your organization. These labels act as identifiers that abstract the content itself, enabling you to manage and track the data type without directly exposing sensitive information. With the right labeling, organizations can also control access in real-time.

For example, labeling a document containing social security numbers or credit card information as Highly Confidential allows your organization to acknowledge the data's sensitivity and enforce appropriate protections, all without needing to access or expose the actual contents.

Why Sentra’s AI-Based Classification Is a Game-Changer

Sentra’s AI-based classification technology enhances data security by ensuring that the sensitivity labels are applied with exceptional accuracy. Leveraging advanced LLM models, Sentra enhances data classification with context-aware capabilities, such as:

Detecting the geographic residency of data subjects.
Differentiating between Customer Data and Employee Data.
Identifying and treating Synthetic or Mock Data differently from real sensitive data.

This context-based approach eliminates the inefficiencies of manual processes and seamlessly scales to meet the demands of modern, complex data environments. By integrating AI into the classification process, Sentra empowers teams to confidently and consistently protect their data—ensuring sensitive information remains secure, no matter where it resides or how it is accessed.

‍Benefits of Labeling and Tagging in Sentra

Sentra enhances your ability to classify and secure data by automatically applying sensitivity labels to data assets. By automating this process, Sentra removes the manual effort required from each team member—achieving accuracy that’s only possible through a deep understanding of what data is sensitive and its broader context.

‍

Here are some key benefits of labeling and tagging in Sentra:

‍

Enhanced Security and Loss Prevention: Sentra’s integration with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions prevents the loss of sensitive and critical data by applying the right sensitivity labels. Sentra’s granular, contextual tags help to provide the detail necessary to action remediation automatically so that operations can scale.‍
Easily Build Your Tagging Rules: Sentra’s Intuitive Rule Builder allows you to automatically apply sensitivity labels to assets based on your pre-existing tagging rules and or define new ones via the builder UI (see screen below). Sentra imports discovered Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MPIP) labels to speed this process.

Labels Move with the Data: Sensitivity labels created in Sentra can be mapped to Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MPIP) labels and applied to various applications like SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, Amazon S3, and Azure Blob Containers. Once applied, labels are stored as metadata and travel with the file or data wherever it goes, ensuring consistent protection across platforms and services.
Automatic Labeling: Sentra allows for the automatic application of sensitivity labels based on the data's content. Auto-tagging rules, configured for each sensitivity label, determine which label should be applied during scans for sensitive information.
Support for Structured and Unstructured Data: Sentra enables labeling for files stored in cloud environments such as Amazon S3 or EBS volumes and for database columns in structured data environments like Amazon RDS. By implementing these labeling practices, your organization can track, manage, and protect data with ease while maintaining compliance and safeguarding sensitive information. Whether collaborating across services or storing data in diverse cloud environments, Sentra ensures your labels and protection follow the data wherever it goes.

Applying Sensitivity Labels to Data Assets in Sentra

In today’s rapidly evolving data security landscape, ensuring that your data is properly classified and protected is crucial. One effective way to achieve this is by applying sensitivity labels to your data assets. Sensitivity labels help ensure that data is handled according to its level of sensitivity, reducing the risk of accidental exposure and enabling compliance with data protection regulations.

‍

Below, we’ll walk you through the necessary steps to automatically apply sensitivity labels to your data assets in Sentra. By following these steps, you can enhance your data governance, improve data security, and maintain clear visibility over your organization's sensitive information.

‍

The process involves three key actions:

Create Sensitivity Labels: The first step in applying sensitivity labels is creating them within Sentra. These labels allow you to categorize data assets according to various rules and classifications. Once set up, these labels will automatically apply to data assets based on predefined criteria, such as the types of classifications detected within the data. Sensitivity labels help ensure that sensitive information is properly identified and protected.
Connect Accounts with Data Assets: The next step is to connect your accounts with the relevant data assets. This integration allows Sentra to automatically discover and continuously scan all your data assets, ensuring that no data goes unnoticed. As new data is created or modified, Sentra will promptly detect and categorize it, keeping your data classification up to date and reducing manual efforts.
Apply Classification Tags: Whenever a data asset is scanned, Sentra will automatically apply classification tags to it, such as data classes, data contexts, and sensitivity labels. These tags are visible in Sentra’s data catalog, giving you a comprehensive overview of your data’s classification status. By applying these tags consistently across all your data assets, you’ll have a clear, automated way to manage sensitive data, ensuring compliance and security.

By following these steps, you can streamline your data classification process, making it easier to protect your sensitive information, improve your data governance practices, and reduce the risk of data breaches.

Applying MPIP Labels

In order to apply Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MPIP) labels based on Sentra sensitivity labels, you are required to follow a few additional steps:

‍

Set up the Microsoft Purview integration - which will allow Sentra to import and sync MPIP sensitivity labels.
Create tagging rules - which will allow you to map Sentra sensitivity labels to MPIP sensitivity labels (for example “Very Confidential” in Sentra would be mapped to “ACME - Highly Confidential” in MPIP), and choose to which services this rule would apply (for example, Microsoft 365 and Amazon S3).

Using Sensitivity Labels in Microsoft DLP

Microsoft Purview DLP (as well as all other industry-leading DLP solutions) supports MPIP labels in its policies so admins can easily control and prevent data loss of sensitive data across multiple services and applications.For instance, a MPIP ‘highly confidential’ label may instruct Microsoft Purview DLP to restrict transfer of sensitive data outside a certain geography. Likewise, another similar label could instruct that confidential intellectual property (IP) is not allowed to be shared within Teams collaborative workspaces. Labels can be used to help control access to sensitive data as well. Organizations can set a rule with read permission only for specific tags. For example, only production IAM roles can access production files. Further, for use cases where data is stored in a single store, organizations can estimate the storage cost for each specific tag.

Build a Stronger Foundation with Accurate Data Classification

Effectively tagging sensitive data unlocks significant benefits for organizations, driving improvements across accuracy, efficiency, scalability, and risk management. With precise classification exceeding 95% accuracy and minimal false positives, organizations can confidently label both structured and unstructured data. Automated tagging rules reduce the reliance on manual effort, saving valuable time and resources. Granular, contextual tags enable confident and automated remediation, ensuring operations can scale seamlessly. Additionally, robust data tagging strengthens DLP and compliance strategies by fully leveraging Microsoft Purview’s capabilities. By streamlining these processes, organizations can consistently label and secure data across their entire estate, freeing resources to focus on strategic priorities and innovation.