How to Prevent Data Breaches in Healthcare and Protect PHI

As organizations navigate the complexities of cloud environments and AI adoption, the need for robust data classification has never been more critical. With sensitive data sprawling across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS platforms, and on-premise systems, enterprises require tools that can discover, classify, and govern data at scale while maintaining compliance with evolving regulations. The best data classification tools not only identify where sensitive information resides but also provide context around data movement, access controls, and potential exposure risks. This guide examines the leading solutions available today, helping you understand which platforms deliver the accuracy, automation, and integration capabilities necessary to secure your data estate.

‍

‍

‍

What Are Data Classification Tools?

Data classification tools are specialized platforms designed to automatically discover, categorize, and label sensitive information across an organization's entire data landscape. These solutions scan structured and unstructured data, from databases and file shares to cloud storage and SaaS applications, to identify content such as personally identifiable information (PII), financial records, intellectual property, and regulated data subject to compliance frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, or CCPA.

‍

Effective data classification tools leverage machine learning algorithms, pattern matching, metadata analysis, and contextual awareness to tag data accurately. Beyond simple discovery, these platforms correlate classification results with access controls, data lineage, and risk indicators, enabling security teams to identify "toxic combinations" where highly sensitive data sits behind overly permissive access settings. This contextual intelligence transforms raw classification data into actionable security insights, helping organizations prevent data breaches, meet compliance obligations, and establish the governance guardrails necessary for secure AI adoption.

Top Data Classification Tools

Sentra

Sentra is a cloud-native data security platform specifically designed for AI-ready data governance. Unlike legacy classification tools built for static environments, Sentra discovers and governs sensitive data at petabyte scale inside your own environment, ensuring data never leaves your control.

‍

What Users Like:

• Classification accuracy and contextual risk insights consistently praised in January 2026 reviews
• Speed and precision of classification engine described as unmatched
• DataTreks capability creates interactive maps tracking data movement, duplication, and transformation
• Distinguishes between real sensitive data and mock data to prevent false positives

Key Capabilities:

• Unified visibility across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and on-premise file shares without moving data
• Deep Microsoft integration leveraging Purview Information Protection with 95%+ accuracy
• Identifies toxic combinations by correlating data sensitivity with access controls
• Tracks data movement to detect when sensitive assets flow into AI pipelines
• Eliminates shadow and ROT data, typically reducing cloud storage costs by ~20%

BigID

BigID uses AI-powered discovery to automatically identify sensitive or regulated information, continuously monitoring data risks with a strong focus on privacy compliance and mapping personal data across organizations.

‍

What Users Like:

• Exceptional data classification capabilities highlighted in January 2026 reviews
• Comprehensive data-discovery features for privacy, protection, and governance
• Broad source connectivity across diverse data environments

Varonis

Varonis specializes in unstructured data classification across file servers, email, and cloud content, providing strong access monitoring and insider threat detection.

‍

What Users Like:

• Detailed file access analysis and real-time protection
• Actionable insights and automated risk visualization

Considerations:

• Learning curve when dealing with comprehensive capabilities

Microsoft Purview

Microsoft Purview delivers exceptional integration for organizations invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, automatically classifying and labeling data across SharePoint, OneDrive, and Microsoft 365 with customizable sensitivity labels and comprehensive compliance reporting.

Nightfall AI

Nightfall AI stands out for real-time detection capabilities across modern SaaS and generative AI applications, using advanced machine learning to prevent data exfiltration and secret sprawl in dynamic environments.

Other Notable Solutions

Forcepoint takes a behavior-based approach, combining context and user intent analysis to classify and protect data across cloud, network, and endpoints, though its comprehensive feature set requires substantial tuning and comes with a steeper learning curve.

‍

Google Cloud DLP excels for teams pursuing cloud-first strategies within Google's environment, offering machine-learning content inspection that scales seamlessly but may be less comprehensive across broader SaaS portfolios.

‍

Atlan functions as a collaborative data workspace emphasizing metadata management, automated tagging, and lineage analysis, seamlessly connecting with modern data stacks like Snowflake, BigQuery, and dbt.

‍

Collibra Data Intelligence Cloud employs self-learning algorithms to uncover, tag, and govern both structured and unstructured data across multi-cloud environments, offering detailed reporting suited to enterprises requiring holistic data discovery with strict compliance oversight.

‍

Informatica leverages AI to profile and classify data while providing end-to-end lineage visualization and analytics, ideal for large, distributed ecosystems demanding scalable data quality and governance.

Evaluation Criteria for Data Classification Tools

Selecting the right data classification tool requires careful assessment across several critical dimensions:

Classification Accuracy

The engine must reliably distinguish between genuine sensitive data and mock or test data to prevent false positives that create alert fatigue and waste security resources. Advanced solutions employ multiple techniques including pattern matching, proximity analysis, validation algorithms, and exact data matching to improve precision.

Platform Coverage

The best solutions scan IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and on-premise file shares without moving data from its original location, using metadata collection and in-environment scanning to maintain data sovereignty while delivering centralized governance. This architectural approach proves especially critical for organizations subject to strict data residency requirements.

Automation and Integration

Look for tools that automatically tag and label data based on classification results, integrate with native platform controls (such as Microsoft Purview labels or Snowflake masking policies), and trigger remediation workflows without manual intervention. The depth of integration with your existing technology stack determines how seamlessly classification insights translate into enforceable security policies.

Data Movement Tracking

Modern tools must monitor how sensitive assets flow between regions, migrate across environments (production to development), and feed into AI systems. This dynamic visibility enables security teams to detect risky data transfers before they result in compliance violations or unauthorized exposure.

Scalability and Performance

Evaluate whether the solution can handle your data volume without degrading scan performance or requiring excessive infrastructure resources. Consider the platform's ability to identify toxic combinations, correlating high-sensitivity data with overly permissive access controls to surface the most critical risks requiring immediate remediation.

Best Free Data Classification Tools

For organizations seeking to implement data classification without immediate budget allocation, two notable free options merit consideration:

‍

Imperva Classifier: Data Classification Tool is available as a free download (requiring only email submission for installation access) and supports multiple operating systems including Windows, Mac, and Linux. It features over 250 built-in search rules for enterprise databases such as Oracle, Microsoft SQL, SAP Sybase, IBM DB2, and MySQL, making it a practical choice for quickly identifying sensitive data at risk across common database platforms.

‍

Apache Atlas represents a robust open-source alternative originally developed for the Hadoop ecosystem. This enterprise-grade solution offers comprehensive metadata management with dedicated data classification capabilities, allowing organizations to tag and categorize data assets while supporting governance, compliance, and data lineage tracking needs.

‍

While free tools offer genuine value, they typically require more in-house expertise for customization and maintenance, may lack advanced AI-powered classification engines, and often provide limited support for modern cloud and SaaS environments. For enterprises with complex, distributed data estates or strict compliance requirements, investing in a commercial solution often proves more cost-effective when factoring in total cost of ownership.

Making the Right Choice for Your Organization

Selecting among the best data classification tools requires aligning platform capabilities with your specific organizational context, data architecture, and security objectives. User reviews from January 2026 provide valuable insights into real-world performance across leading platforms.

‍

When evaluating solutions, prioritize running proof-of-concept deployments against representative samples of your actual data estate. This hands-on testing reveals how well each platform handles your specific data types, integration requirements, and performance expectations. Develop a scoring framework that weights evaluation criteria according to your priorities, whether that's classification accuracy, automation capabilities, platform coverage, or integration depth with existing systems.

‍

Consider your organization's trajectory alongside current needs. If AI adoption is accelerating, ensure your chosen platform can discover AI copilots, map their knowledge base access, and enforce granular behavioral guardrails on sensitive data. For organizations with complex multi-cloud environments, unified visibility without data movement becomes non-negotiable. Enterprises subject to strict compliance regimes should prioritize platforms with proven regulatory alignment and automated policy enforcement.

‍

The data classification landscape in 2026 offers diverse solutions, from free and open-source options suitable for organizations with strong technical teams to comprehensive commercial platforms designed for petabyte-scale, AI-driven environments. By carefully evaluating your requirements against the strengths of leading platforms, you can select a solution that not only secures your current data estate but also enables confident adoption of AI technologies that drive competitive advantage.

<blogcta-big>

‍

OpenClaw, previously known as MoltBot, isn't just another cybersecurity story - it's a wake-up call for every organization. With over 150,000 GitHub stars and more than 300,000 users in just two months, OpenClaw’s popularity signals a huge change: autonomous AI agents are spreading quickly and dramatically broadening the attack surface in businesses. This is far beyond the risks of a typical ChatGPT plugin or a staff member pasting data into a chatbot. These agents live on user machines and servers with shell-level access, file system privileges, live memory control, and broad integration abilities, usually outside IT or security’s purview.

‍

Older perimeter and endpoint security tools weren’t built to find or control agents that can learn, store information, and act independently in all kinds of environments. As organizations face this shadow AI risk, the need for real-time, data-level visibility becomes critical. Enter Data Security Posture Management (DSPM): a way for enterprises to understand, monitor, and respond to the unique threats that OpenClaw and its next-generation kin pose.

What makes OpenClaw different - and uniquely dangerous - for security teams?

OpenClaw runs by setting up a local HTTP server and agent gateway on endpoints. It provides shell access, automates browsers, and links with over 50 messaging platforms. But what really sets it apart is how it combines these features with persistent memory. That means agents can remember actions and data far better than any script or bot before. Palo Alto Networks calls this the 'lethal trifecta': direct access to private data, exposure to untrusted content, communication outside the organization, and persistent memory.

‍

This risk isn't hypothetical. OpenClaw’s skill ecosystem functions like an unguarded software supply chain. Any third-party 'skill' a user adds to an agent can run with full privileges, opening doors to vulnerabilities that original developers can’t foresee. While earlier concerns focused on employees leaking information to public chatbots, tools like OpenClaw operate quietly at system level, often without IT noticing.

From theory to reality: OpenClaw exploitation is active and widespread

This threat is already real. OpenClaw’s design has exposed thousands of organizations to actual attacks. For instance, CVE-2026-25253 is a severe remote code execution flaw caused by a WebSocket validation error, with a CVSS score of 8.8. It lets attackers compromise an agent with a single click (critical OpenClaw vulnerability).

‍

Attackers wasted no time. The ClawHavoc malware campaign, for example, spread over 341 malicious 'skills’, using OpenClaw’s official marketplace to push info-stealers and RATs directly into vulnerable environments. Over 21,000 exposed OpenClaw instances have turned up on the public internet, often protected by nothing stronger than a weak password, or no authentication at all. Researchers even found plaintext password storage in the code. The risk is both immediate and persistent.

The shadow AI dimension: why you’re likely exposed

One of the trickiest parts of OpenClaw and MoltBot is how easily they run outside official oversight. Research shows that more than 22% of enterprise customers have found MoltBot operating without IT approval. Agents connect with personal messaging apps, making it easy for employees to use them on devices IT doesn’t manage, creating blind spots in endpoint management.

‍

This reflects a bigger shift: 68% of employees now access free AI tools using personal accounts, and 57% still paste sensitive data into these services. The risks tied to shadow AI keep rising, and so does the cost of breaches: incidents involving unsanctioned AI tools now average $670,000 higher than those without. No wonder experts at Palo Alto, Straiker, Google Cloud, and Intruder strongly advise enterprises to block or at least closely watch OpenClaw deployments.

Why classic security tools are defenseless - and why DSPM is essential

Despite many advances in endpoint, identity, and network defense, these tools fall short against AI agents such as OpenClaw. Agents often run code with system privileges and communicate independently, sometimes over encrypted or unfamiliar channels. This blinds existing security tools to what internal agent 'skills' are doing or what data they touch and process. The attack surface now includes prompt injection through emails and documents, poisoning of agent memory, delayed attacks, and natural language input that bypasses static scans.

‍

The missing link is visibility: understanding what data any AI agent - sanctioned or shadow - can access, process, or send out. Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) responds to this by mapping what data AI agents can reach, tracing sensitive data to and from agents everywhere they run. Newer DSPM features such as real-time risk scoring, shadow AI discovery, and detailed flow tracking help organizations see and control risks from AI agents at the data layer (Sentra DSPM for AI agent security).

Immediate enterprise action plan: detection, mapping, and control

Security teams need to move quickly. Start by scanning for OpenClaw, MoltBot, and other shadow AI agents across endpoints, networks, and SaaS apps. Once you know where agents are, check which sensitive data they can access by using DSPM tools with AI agent awareness, such as those from Sentra (Sentra’s AI asset discovery). Treat unauthorized installations as active security incidents: reset credentials, investigate activity, and prevent agents from running on your systems following expert recommendations.

‍

For long-term defense, add continuous shadow AI tracking to your operations. Let DSPM keep your data inventory current, trace possible leaks, and set the right controls for every workflow involving AI. Sentra gives you a single place to find all agent activity, see your actual AI data exposure, and take fast, business-aware action.

Conclusion

OpenClaw is simply the first sign of what will soon be a string of AI agent-driven security problems for enterprises. As companies use AI more to boost productivity and automate work, the chance of unsanctioned agents acting with growing privileges and integrations will continue to rise. Gartner expects that by 2028, one in four cyber incidents will stem from AI agent misuse - and attacks have already started to appear in the news.

‍

Success with AI is no longer about whether you use agents like OpenClaw; it’s about controlling how far they reach and what they can do. Old-school defenses can’t keep up with how quickly shadow AI spreads. Only data-focused security, with total AI agent discovery, risk mapping, and ongoing monitoring, can provide the clarity and controls needed for this new world. Sentra's DSPM platform offers precisely that. Take the first steps now: identify your shadow AI risks, map out where your data can go, and make AI agent security a top priority.

<blogcta-big>

‍

Discover  What DSPM Vendors Try to Hide 

Your goal in running a data security/DSPM POV is to evaluate all important performance and cost parameters so you can make the best decision and avoid unpleasant surprises. Vendors, on the other hand, are looking for a ‘quick win’ and will often suggest shortcuts like using a limited test data set and copying your data to their environment.

‍

 On the surface this might sound like a reasonable approach, but if you don’t test real data types and volumes in your own environment, the POV process may hide costly failures or compliance violations that will quickly become apparent in production. A recent evaluation of Sentra versus another top emerging DSPM exposed how the other solution’s performance dropped and costs skyrocketed when deployed at petabyte scale. Worse, the emerging DSPM removed data from the customer environment - a clear controls violation.

If you want to run a successful POV and avoid DSPM buyers' remorse you need to look out for these "dirty little secrets".

Dirty Little Secret #1:
‘Start small’ can mean ‘fails at scale’

The biggest 'dirty secret' is that scalability limits are hidden behind the 'start small' suggestion. Many DSPM platforms cannot scale to modern petabyte-sized data environments. Vendors try to conceal this architectural weakness by encouraging small, tightly scoped POVs that never stress the system and create false confidence. Upon broad deployment, this weakness is quickly exposed as scans slow and refresh cycles stretch, forcing teams to drastically reduce scope or frequency. This failure is fundamentally architectural, lacking parallel orchestration and elastic execution, proving that the 'start small' advice was a deliberate tactic to avoid exposing the platform’s inevitable bottleneck.In a recent POV, Sentra successfully scanned 10x more data in approximately the same time than the alternative:

‍

Dirty Little Secret #2:
High cloud cost breaks continuous security

Another reason some vendors try to limit the scale of POVs is to hide the real cloud cost of running them in production. They often use brute-force scanning that reads excessive data, consumes massive compute resources, and is architecturally inefficient. This is easy to mask during short, limited POVs, but quickly drives up cloud bills in production. The resulting cost pressure forces organizations to reduce scan frequency and scope, quietly shifting the platform from continuous security control to periodic inventory. Ultimately, tools that cannot scale scanners efficiently on-demand or scan infrequently trade essential security for cost, proving they are only affordable when they are not fully utilized. In a recent POV run on 100 petabytes of data, Sentra proved to be 10x more operationally cost effective to run:

‍

Dirty Little Secret #3:
‘Good enough’ accuracy degrades security

Accuracy is fundamental to Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) and should not be compromised. While a few points difference may not seem like a deal breaker, every percentage point of classification accuracy can dramatically affect all downstream security controls. Costs increase as manual intervention is required to address FPs. When organizations automate controls based on these inaccuracies, the DSPM platform becomes a source of risk. Confidence is lost. The secret is kept safe because the POV never validates the platform's accuracy against known sensitive data.

In a recent POV Sentra was able to prove less than one percent rate of false positives and false negatives:

DSPM POV Red Flags 

• Copy data to the vendor environment for a “quick win”
  
• Limit features or capabilities to simplify testing
  
• Artificially reduce the size of scanned data
  
• Restrict integrations to avoid “complications”
  
• Limit or avoid API usage
  

These shortcuts don’t make a POV easier - they make it misleading.

Four DSPM POV Requirements That Expose the Truth

If you want a DSPM POV that reflects production reality, insist on these requirements:

1. Scalability

‍Run discovery and classification on at least 1 petabyte of real data, including unstructured object storage. Completion time must be measured in hours or days - not weeks.

2. Cost Efficiency

‍Operate scans continuously at scale and measure actual cloud resource consumption. If cost forces reduced frequency or scope, the model is unsustainable.

3. Accuracy

‍Validate results against known sensitive data. Measure false positives and false negatives explicitly. Accuracy must be quantified and repeatable.

4. Unstructured Data Depth
‍

Test long-form, heterogeneous, real-world unstructured data including audio, video, etc. Classification must demonstrate contextual understanding, not just keyword matches.

A DSPM solution that only performs well in a limited POV will lead to painful, costly buyer’s regret. Once in production, the failures in scalability, cost efficiency, accuracy, and unstructured data depth quickly become apparent.

Getting ready to run a DSPM POV? Schedule a demo.

‍

<blogcta-big>