How to Prevent Data Breaches in Healthcare and Protect PHI

As enterprises scale cloud usage and adopt AI, the value of Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) is no longer just about checking a tool category box. It’s about protecting what matters most: sensitive data that fuels modern business and AI workflows.

‍

Traditional content on DSPM often focuses on cost components and deployment considerations. That’s useful, but incomplete. To truly justify DSPM to executives and boards, security leaders need a holistic, outcome-focused view that ties data risk reduction to measurable business impact.

‍

In this blog, we unpack the real, measurable benefits of DSPM, beyond just cost savings, and explain how modern DSPM strategies deliver rapid value far beyond what most legacy tools promise. 

1. Visibility Isn’t Enough - You Need Context

A common theme in DSPM discussions is that tools help you see where sensitive data lives. That’s important, but it’s only the first step. Real value comes from understanding context. Who can access the data, how it’s being used, and where risk exists in the wider security posture. Organizations that stop at discovery often struggle to prioritize risk and justify spend.

‍

Modern DSPM solutions go further by:

• Correlating data locations with access rights and usage patterns
• Mapping sensitive data flows across cloud, SaaS, and hybrid environments
• Detecting shadow data stores and unmanaged copies that silently increase exposure
• Linking findings to business risk and compliance frameworks

This contextual intelligence drives better decisions and higher ROI because teams aren’t just counting sensitive data, they’re continuously governing it.

2. DSPM Saves Time and Shrinks Attack Surface Fast

One way DSPM delivers measurable business value is by streamlining functions that used to be manual, siloed, and slow:

• Automated classification reduces manual tagging and human error
• Continuous discovery eliminates periodic, snapshot-alone inventories
• Policy enforcement reduces time spent reacting to audit requests

This translates into:

• Faster compliance reporting
• Shorter audit cycles
• Rapid identification and remediation of critical risks

For security leaders, the speed of insight becomes a competitive advantage, especially in environments where data volumes grow daily and AI models can touch every corner of the enterprise.

3. Cost Benefits That Matter, but with Context

Lately I’m hearing many DSPM discussions break down cost components like scanning compute, licensing, operational expenses, and potential cloud savings. That’s a good start because DSPM can reduce cloud waste by identifying stale or redundant data, but it’s not the whole story.

Here’s where truly strategic DSPM differs:

Operational Efficiency

When DSPM tools automate discovery, classification, and risk scoring:

• Teams spend less time on manual reports
• Alert fatigue drops as noise is filtered
• Engineers can focus on higher-value work

Breach Avoidance

Data breaches are expensive. According to industry studies, the average cost of a data breach runs into millions, far outweighing the cost of DSPM itself. A DSPM solution that prevents even one breach or major compliance failure pays for itself tenfold

Compliance as a Value Center

Rather than treating compliance as a cost center consider that:

• DSPM reduces audit overhead
• Provides automated evidence for frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS
• Improves confidence in reporting accuracy

That’s a measurable business benefit CFOs can appreciate and boards expect.

‍

4. DSPM Reduces Risk Vector Multipliers Like AI

One benefit that’s often under-emphasized is how DSPM reduces risk vector multipliers, the factors that amplify risk exponentially beyond simple exposure counts.

‍

In 2026 and beyond, AI systems are increasingly part of the risk profile. Modern DSPM help reduce the heightened risk from AI by:

• Identifying where sensitive data intersects with AI training or inference pipelines
• Governing how AI tools and assistants can access sensitive content
• Providing risk context so teams can prevent data leakage into LLMs

This kind of data-centric, contextual, and continuous governance should be considered a requirement for secure AI adoption, no compromise.

5. Telling the DSPM ROI Story

The most convincing DSPM ROI stories aren’t spreadsheets, they’re narratives that align with business outcomes. The key to building a credible ROI case is connecting metrics, security impact, and business outcomes:

‍

‍

By telling the story this way, security leaders can speak in terms the board and executives care about: risk reduction, compliance assurance, operational alignment, and controlled growth.

‍

How to Evaluate DSPM for Real ROI

To capture tangible return, don’t evaluate DSPM solely on cost or feature checklists. Instead, test for:

1. Scalability Under Real Load

Can the tool discover and classify petabytes of data, including unstructured content, without degrading performance?

2. Accuracy That Holds Up

Poor classification undermines automation. True ROI requires consistent, top-performing accuracy rates.

3. Operational Cost Predictability

Beware of DSPM solutions that drive unexpected cloud expenses due to inefficient scanning or redundant data reads.

4. Integration With Enforcement Workflows

Visibility without action isn’t ROI. Your DSPM should feed DLP, IAM/CIEM, SIEM/SOAR, and compliance pipelines (ticketing, policy automation, alerts).

‍

ROI Is a Journey, Not a Number

Costs matter, but value lives in context. DSPM is not just a cost center, it’s a force multiplier for secure cloud operations, AI readiness, compliance, and risk reduction. Instead of seeing DSPM as another tool, forward-looking teams view it as a fundamental decision support engine that changes how risk is measured, prioritized, and controlled.

Ready to See Real DSPM Value in Your Environment?

Download Sentra’s “DSPM Dirty Little Secrets” guide, a practical roadmap for evaluating DSPM with clarity, confidence, and production reality in mind.

👉 Download the DSPM Dirty Little Secrets guide now

Want a personalized walkthrough of how Sentra delivers measurable DSPM value?
👉 Request a demo

<blogcta-big>

‍

For years, security programs have focused on protecting infrastructure: networks, servers, endpoints, and applications. That approach made sense when systems were static and data rarely moved. It’s no longer enough.

‍

Recent breach data shows a consistent pattern. Organizations detect incidents, restore systems, and close tickets, yet remain unable to answer the most important question regulators and customers often ask:

‍

Where does my sensitive data reside?

Who or what has access to this data and are they authorized?

Which specific sensitive datasets were accessed or exfiltrated?

‍

Infrastructure security alone cannot answer that question.

Infrastructure Alerts Detect Events, Not Impact

Most security tooling is infrastructure-centric by design. SIEMs, EDRs, NDRs, and CSPM tools monitor hosts, processes, IPs, and configurations. When something abnormal happens, they generate alerts.

‍

What they do not tell you is:

• Which specific datasets were accessed
• Whether those datasets contained PHI or PII
• Whether sensitive data was copied, moved, or exfiltrated

Traditional tools monitor the "plumbing" (network traffic, server logs, etc.) While they can flag that a database was accessed by an unauthorized IP, they often cannot distinguish between an attacker downloading a public template or downloading a table containing 50,000 Social Security numbers. An alert is not the same as understanding the exposure of the data stored inside it. Without that context, incident response teams are forced to infer impact rather than determine it.

The “Did They Access the Data?” Problem

This gap becomes pronounced during ransomware and extortion incidents.

‍

In many cases:

• Operations are restored from backups
• Infrastructure is rebuilt
• Access is reduced
• (Hopefully!) attackers are removed from the environment

Yet organizations still cannot confirm whether sensitive data was accessed or exfiltrated during the dwell time.

Without data-level visibility:

• Legal and compliance teams must assume worst-case exposure
• Breach notifications expand unnecessarily
• Regulatory penalties increase due to uncertainty, not necessarily damage
  
  

The inability to scope an incident accurately is not a tooling failure during the breach, it is a visibility failure that existed long before the breach occurred. Under regulations like GDPR or CCPA/CPRA, if an organization cannot prove that sensitive data wasn’t accessed during a breach, they are often legally required to notify all potentially affected parties. This ‘over-notification’ is costly and damaging to reputation.

Data Movement Is the Real Attack Vulnerability

Modern environments are defined by constant data movement:

• Cloud migrations
• SaaS integrations
• App dev lifecycles
• Analytics and ETL pipelines
• AI and ML workflows

Each transition creates blind spots.

Legacy platforms awaiting migration often exist in a “wait state” with reduced monitoring. Data copied into cloud storage or fed into AI pipelines frequently loses lineage and classification context. Posture may vary and traditional controls no longer apply consistently. From an attacker’s perspective, these environments are ideal. From a defender’s perspective, they are blind spots.

Policies Are Not Proof

Most organizations can produce policies stating that sensitive data is encrypted, access-controlled, and monitored. Increasingly, regulators are moving from point-in-time audits to requiring continuous evidence of control.  

‍

Regulators are asking for evidence:

• Where does PHI live right now?
• Who or what can access it?
• How do you know this hasn’t changed since the last audit?

Point-in-time audits cannot answer those questions. Neither can static documentation. Exposure and access drift continuously, especially in cloud and AI-driven environments.

Compliance depends on continuous control, not periodic attestation.

What Data-Centric Security Actually Requires

Accurately proving compliance and scoping breach impact requires security visibility that is anchored to the data itself, not the infrastructure surrounding it.

‍

At a minimum, this means:

• Continuous discovery and classification of sensitive data
• Consistent compliance reporting and controls across cloud, SaaS, On-Prem, and migration states
• Clear visibility into which identities, services, and AI tools can access specific datasets
• Detection and response signals tied directly to sensitive data exposure and movement

This is the operational foundation of Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) and Data Detection and Response (DDR). These capabilities do not replace infrastructure security controls; they close the gap those controls leave behind by connecting security events to actual data impact.

‍

This is the problem space Sentra was built to address.

Sentra provides continuous visibility into where sensitive data lives, how it moves, and who or what can access it, and ties security and compliance outcomes to that visibility. Without this layer, organizations are forced to infer breach impact and compliance posture instead of proving it.

Why Data-Centric Security Is Required for Today's Compliance and Breach Response

Infrastructure security can detect that an incident occurred, but it cannot determine which sensitive data was accessed, copied, or exfiltrated. Without data-level evidence, organizations cannot accurately scope breaches, contain risk, or prove compliance, regardless of how many alerts or controls are in place. Modern breach response and regulatory compliance require continuous visibility into sensitive data, its lineage, and its access paths. Infrastructure-only security models are no longer sufficient.

Want to see how Sentra provides complete visibility and control of sensitive data?‍

Schedule a Demo

<blogcta-big>

‍

2025 was a pivotal year for Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs). As cyber threats surged and digital acceleration transformed business, CISOs gained more influence in boardrooms but also took on greater accountability. The old model of perimeter-based defense has ended. Security strategies now focus on resilience and real-time visibility with sensitive data protection at the core.

‍

As 2026 approaches, CISOs are turning this year’s lessons into a proactive, AI-smart, and business-aligned strategy. This article highlights the top CISO priorities for 2026, the industry’s shift from prevention to resilience, and how Sentra supports security leaders in this new phase.

Lessons from 2025: Transparency, AI Risk, and Platform Resilience

Over the past year, CISOs encountered high-profile breaches and shifting demands. According to the Splunk 2025 CISO Report an impressive 82% reported direct interactions with CEOs, and 83% regularly attended board meetings. Still, only 29% of board members had cybersecurity experience, leading to frequent misalignment around budgets, innovation, and staffing.

‍

The data is clear: 76% of CISOs expected a significant cyberattack, but 58% felt unprepared, as reported in the Proofpoint 2025 Voice of the CISO Report. Many CISOs struggled with overwhelming tool sprawl and alert fatigue, 76% named these as major challenges. The rapid growth in cloud, SaaS, and GenAI environments left major visibility gaps, especially for unstructured and shadow data. Most of all, CISOs concluded that resilience - quick detection, rapid response, and keeping the business running, matters more than just preventing attacks. This shift is changing the way security budgets will be spent in 2026.

The Evolution of DSPM: From Inventory to Intelligent, AI-Aware Defense

First generation data security posture management (DSPM) tools focused on identifying assets and manually classifying data. Now, CISOs must automatically map, classify, and assign risk scores to data - structured, unstructured, or AI-generated - across cloud, on-prem and SaaS environments, instantly. If organizations lack this capability, critical data remains at risk (Data as the Core Focus in the Cloud Security Ecosystem).

‍

AI brings both opportunity and risk. CISOs are working to introduce GenAI security policies while facing challenges like data leakage, unsanctioned AI projects, and compliance issues. DSPM solutions that use machine learning and real-time policy enforcement have become essential.

The Top Five CISO Priorities in 2026

‍

1. Secure and Responsible AI: As AI accelerates across the business, CISOs must ensure it does not introduce unmanaged data risk. The focus will be on maintaining visibility and control over sensitive data used by AI systems, preventing unintended exposure, and establishing governance that allows the company to innovate with AI while protecting trust, compliance, and brand reputation.

2. Modern Data Governance: As sensitive data sprawls across on-prem, cloud, SaaS, and data lakes, CISOs face mounting compliance pressure without clear visibility into where that data resides. The priority will be establishing accurate classification and governance of sensitive, unstructured, and shadow data - not only to meet regulatory obligations, but to proactively reduce enterprise risk, limit blast radius, and strengthen overall security posture.
   
   
3. Tool Consolidation: As cloud and application environments grow more complex, CISOs are under pressure to reduce data sprawl without increasing risk. The priority is consolidating fragmented cloud and application security tools into unified platforms that embed protection earlier in the development lifecycle, improve risk visibility across environments, and lower operational overhead. For boards, this shift represents both stronger security outcomes and a clearer return on security investment through reduced complexity, cost, and exposure.

4. Offensive Security/Continuous Testing: One-time security assessments can no longer keep pace with AI-driven and rapidly evolving threats. CISOs are making continuous offensive security a core risk-management practice, regularly testing environments across hardware, cloud, and SaaS to expose real-world vulnerabilities. For the board, this provides ongoing validation of security effectiveness and reduces the likelihood of unpleasant surprises from unknown exposures. Some exciting new AI red team solutions are appearing on the scene such as 7ai, Mend.io, Method Security, and Veria Labs.

5. Zero Trust Identity Governance: Identity has become the primary attack surface, making advanced governance essential rather than optional. CISOs are prioritizing data-centric, Zero Trust identity controls to limit excessive access, reduce insider risk, and counter AI-enabled attacks. At the board level, this shift is critical to protecting sensitive assets and maintaining resilience against emerging threats.

‍

These areas show a greater need for automation, better context, and clearer reporting for boards.

Sentra Enables Secure and Responsible AI with Modern Data Governance

As AI becomes central to business strategy, CISOs are being held accountable for ensuring innovation does not outpace security, governance, or trust. Secure and Responsible AI is no longer about policy alone, it requires continuous visibility into the sensitive data flowing into AI systems, control over shadow and AI-generated data, and the ability to prevent unintended exposure before it becomes a business risk.

‍

At the same time, Modern Data Governance has emerged as a foundational requirement. Exploding data volumes across cloud, SaaS, data lakes, and on-prem environments have made traditional governance models ineffective. CISOs need accurate classification, unified visibility, and enforceable controls that go beyond regulatory checkboxes to actively reduce enterprise risk.

‍

Sentra brings these priorities together by giving security leaders a clear, real-time understanding of where sensitive data lives, how it is being used - including by AI - and where risk is accumulating across the organization. By unifying DSPM and Data Detection & Response (DDR), Sentra enables CISOs to move from reactive security to proactive governance, supporting AI adoption while maintaining compliance, resilience, and board-level confidence.

Looking ahead to 2026, the CISOs who lead will be those who can see, govern, and secure their data everywhere it exists and ensure it is used responsibly to power the next phase of growth. Sentra provides the foundation to make that possible.

Conclusion

The CISO’s role in 2025 shifted from putting out fires to driving change alongside business leadership. Expectations will keep rising in 2026; balancing board expectations, the opportunities and threats of AI, and constant new risks takes a smart platform and real-time clarity.

‍

Sentra delivers the foundation and intelligence CISOs need to build resilience, stay compliant, and fuel data-powered AI growth with secure data. Those who can see, secure, and respond wherever their data lives will lead. Sentra is your partner to move forward with confidence in 2026.

<blogcta-big>