All Resources
In this article:
minus iconplus icon
This is some text inside of a div block.
Share the Article
Copy to clipboard

AWS Security Groups: Best Practices, EC2, & More

November 1, 2023
8
 Min Read
Data Security
Author Image
Ron Reiter
Co-Founder and CTO
linkedin logotwitter logo

What are AWS Security Groups?

AWS Security Groups are a vital component of AWS's network security and cloud data security. They act as a virtual firewall that controls inbound and outbound traffic to and from AWS resources. Each AWS resource, such as Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances or Relational Database Service (RDS) instances, can be associated with one or more security groups.

‍

Security groups operate at the instance level, meaning that they define rules that specify what traffic is allowed to reach the associated resources. These rules can be applied to both incoming and outgoing traffic, providing a granular way to manage access to your AWS resources.

How Do AWS Security Groups Work?

To comprehend how AWS Security Groups, in conjunction with AWS security tools, function within the AWS ecosystem, envision them as gatekeepers for inbound and outbound network traffic. These gatekeepers rely on a predefined set of rules to determine whether traffic is permitted or denied.

‍

Here's a simplified breakdown of the process:

Inbound Traffic: When an incoming packet arrives at an AWS resource, AWS evaluates the rules defined in the associated security group. If the packet matches any of the rules allowing the traffic, it is permitted; otherwise, it is denied.

Outbound Traffic: Outbound traffic from an AWS resource is also controlled by the security group's rules. It follows the same principle: traffic is allowed or denied based on the rules defined for outbound traffic.

Illustration of how security groups work in AWS.

Security groups are stateful, which means that if you allow inbound traffic from a specific IP address, the corresponding outbound response traffic is automatically allowed. This simplifies rule management and ensures that related traffic is not blocked.

Types of Security Groups in AWS

There are two types of AWS Security Groups:

‍

Types of AWS Security Groups Description
EC2-Classic Security Groups These are used with instances launched in the EC2-Classic network. It is an older network model, and AWS encourages the use of Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) for new instances.
VPC Security Groups These are used with instances launched within a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC). VPCs offer more advanced networking features and are the standard for creating isolated network environments in AWS.

‍

For this guide, we will focus on VPC Security Groups as they are more versatile and widely used.

How to Use Multiple Security Groups in AWS

In AWS, you can associate multiple security groups with a single resource. When multiple security groups are associated with an instance, AWS combines their rules. This is done in a way that allows for flexibility and ease of management. The rules are evaluated as follows:

‍

  • Union: Rules from different security groups are merged. If any security group allows the traffic, it is permitted.
  • Deny Overrides Allow: If a rule in one security group denies the traffic, it takes precedence over any rule that allows the traffic in another security group.
  • Default Deny: If a packet doesn't match any rule, it is denied by default.

‍

Let's explore how to create, manage, and configure security groups in AWS.

Security Groups and Network ACLs

Before diving into security group creation, it's essential to understand the difference between security groups and Network Access Control Lists (NACLs). While both are used to control inbound and outbound traffic, they operate at different levels.

‍

Security Groups: These operate at the instance level, filtering traffic to and from the resources (e.g., EC2 instances). They are stateful, which means that if you allow incoming traffic from a specific IP, outbound response traffic is automatically allowed.

‍

Network ACLs (NACLs): These operate at the subnet level and act as stateless traffic filters. NACLs define rules for all resources within a subnet, and they do not automatically allow response traffic.

Illustration of how security groups and Network ACLs work.

For the most granular control over traffic, use security groups for instance-level security and NACLs for subnet-level security.

AWS Security Groups Outbound Rules

AWS Security Groups are defined by a set of rules that specify which traffic is allowed and which is denied. Each rule consists of the following components:

‍

  • Type: The protocol type (e.g., TCP, UDP, ICMP) to which the rule applies.
  • Port Range: The range of ports to which the rule applies.
  • Source/Destination: The IP range or security group that is allowed to access the resource.
  • Allow/Deny: Whether the rule allows or denies traffic that matches the rule criteria.

‍

Now, let's look at how to create a security group in AWS.

Creating a Security Group in AWS

To create a security group in AWS (through the console), follow these steps:

Steps Description
Sign in to the AWS Management Console Log in to your AWS account.
Navigate to the EC2 Dashboard Select the "EC2" service.
Access the Security Groups Section In the EC2 Dashboard, under the "Network & Security" category, click on "Security Groups" in the navigation pane on the left.
Create a New Security Group Click the "Create Security Group" button.
Configure Security Group Settings
  • Security Group Name: Give your security group a descriptive name.
  • Description: Provide a brief description of the security group's purpose.
  • Add Inbound Rules: Under the "Inbound Rules" section, define rules for incoming traffic. Click the "Add Rule" button and specify the type, port range, and source IP or security group.
Add Outbound Rules Similarly, add rules for outbound traffic under the "Outbound Rules" section.
Review and Create Double-check your rule settings and click "Create Security Group."

‍

Your security group is now created and ready to be associated with AWS resources.

Below, we'll demonstrate how to create a security group using the AWS CLI.

 
aws ec2 create-security-group --group-name MySecurityGroup --description
"My Security Group"

In the above command:

--group-name specifies the name of your security group.

--description provides a brief description of the security group.

‍

After executing this command, AWS will return the security group's unique identifier, which is used to reference the security group in subsequent commands.

Adding a Rule to a Security Group

Once your security group is created, you can easily add, edit, or remove rules. To add a new rule to an existing security group through a console, follow these steps:

‍

  1. Select the security group you want to modify in the EC2 Dashboard.
  2. In the "Inbound Rules" or "Outbound Rules" tab, click the "Edit Inbound Rules" or "Edit Outbound Rules" button.
  3. Click the "Add Rule" button.
  4. Define the rule with the appropriate type, port range, and source/destination.
  5. Click "Save Rules."

‍

To create a Security Group, you can also use the create-security-group command, specifying a name and description. After creating the Security Group, you can add rules to it using the authorize-security-group-ingress and authorize-security-group-egress commands. The code snippet below adds an inbound rule to allow SSH traffic from a specific IP address range.

 
# Create a new Security Group
aws ec2 create-security-group --group-name MySecurityGroup --description "My Security Group"

# Add an inbound rule to allow SSH traffic from a specific IP address
aws ec2 authorize-security-group-ingress --group-id sg-0123456789abcdef0 --protocol tcp --port 22 --cidr 203.0.113.0/24

Assigning a Security Group to an EC2 Instance

To secure your EC2 instances using security groups through the console, follow these steps:

‍

  1. Navigate to the EC2 Dashboard in the AWS Management Console.
  2. Select the EC2 instance to which you want to assign a security group.
  3. Click the "Actions" button, choose "Networking," and then click "Change Security Groups."
  4. In the "Assign Security Groups" dialog, select the desired security group(s) and click "Save."

‍

Your EC2 instance is now associated with the selected security group(s), and its inbound and outbound traffic is governed by the rules defined in those groups.

 
# Launch an EC2 instance and associate it with a Security Group
aws ec2 run-instances --image-id ami-12345678 --count 1 --instance-type t2.micro --key-name MyKeyPair --security-group-ids sg-0123456789abcdef0

When launching an EC2 instance, you can specify the Security Groups to associate with it. In the example above, we associate the instance with a Security Group using the --security-group-ids flag.

Deleting a Security Group

To delete a security group via the AWS Management Console, follow these steps:

‍

  1. In the EC2 Dashboard, select the security group you wish to delete.
  2. Check for associated instances and disassociate them, if necessary.
  3. Click the "Actions" button, and choose "Delete Security Group."
  4. Confirm the deletion when prompted.
  5. Receive confirmation of the security group's removal.
 
# Delete a Security Group
aws ec2 delete-security-group --group-id sg-0123456789abcdef0

To delete a Security Group, you can use the delete-security-group command and specify the Security Group's ID through AWS CLI.

AWS Security Groups Best Practices

Here are some additional best practices to keep in mind when working with AWS Security Groups:

Enable Tracking and Alerting

One best practice is to enable tracking and alerting for changes made to your Security Groups. AWS provides a feature called AWS Config, which allows you to track changes to your AWS resources, including Security Groups. By setting up AWS Config, you can receive notifications when changes occur, helping you detect and respond to any unauthorized modifications quickly.

Delete Unused Security Groups

Over time, you may end up with unused or redundant Security Groups in your AWS environment. It's essential to regularly review your Security Groups and delete any that are no longer needed. This reduces the complexity of your security policies and minimizes the risk of accidental misconfigurations.

Avoid Incoming Traffic Through 0.0.0.0/0

One common mistake in Security Group configurations is allowing incoming traffic from '0.0.0.0/0,' which essentially opens up your resources to the entire internet. It's best to avoid this practice unless you have a specific use case that requires it. Instead, restrict incoming traffic to only the IP addresses or IP ranges necessary for your applications.

Use Descriptive Rule Names

When creating Security Group rules, provide descriptive names that make it clear why the rule exists. This simplifies rule management and auditing.

Implement Least Privilege

Follow the principle of least privilege by allowing only the minimum required access to your resources. Avoid overly permissive rules.

Regularly Review and Update Rules

Your security requirements may change over time. Regularly review and update your Security Group rules to adapt to evolving security needs.

Avoid Using Security Group Rules as the Only Layer of Defense

Security Groups are a crucial part of your defense, but they should not be your only layer of security. Combine them with other security measures, such as NACLs and web application firewalls, for a comprehensive security strategy.

Leverage AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)

Use AWS IAM to control access to AWS services and resources. IAM roles and policies can provide fine-grained control over who can modify Security Groups and other AWS resources.

Implement Network Segmentation

Use different Security Groups for different tiers of your application, such as web servers, application servers, and databases. This helps in implementing network segmentation and ensuring that resources only communicate as necessary.

Regularly Audit and Monitor

Set up auditing and monitoring tools to detect and respond to security incidents promptly. AWS provides services like AWS CloudWatch and AWS CloudTrail for this purpose.

Conclusion

Securing your cloud environment is paramount when using AWS, and Security Groups play a vital role in achieving this goal. By understanding how Security Groups work, creating and managing rules, and following best practices, you can enhance the security of your AWS resources. Remember to regularly review and update your security group configurations to adapt to changing security requirements and maintain a robust defense against potential threats. With the right approach to AWS Security Groups, you can confidently embrace the benefits of cloud computing while ensuring the safety and integrity of your applications and data.

<blogcta-big>

‍

Author Image
Ron Reiter
Co-Founder and CTO
linkedin logotwitter logo

Discover Ron’s expertise, shaped by over 20 years of hands-on tech and leadership experience in cybersecurity, cloud, big data, and machine learning. As a serial entrepreneur and seed investor, Ron has contributed to the success of several startups, including Axonius, Firefly, Guardio, Talon Cyber Security, and Lightricks, after founding a company acquired by Oracle.

Subscribe

Latest Blog Posts

Nikki Ralston
Nikki Ralston
March 16, 2026
4
Min Read

S3 Bucket Security Best Practices

S3 Bucket Security Best Practices

Amazon S3 is one of the most widely used cloud storage services in the world, and with that scale comes real security responsibility. Misconfigured buckets remain a leading cause of sensitive data exposure in cloud environments, from accidentally public objects to overly permissive policies that go unnoticed for months. Whether you're hosting static assets, storing application data, or archiving compliance records, getting S3 bucket security right is not optional. This guide covers foundational defaults, policy configurations, and practical checklists to give you an actionable reference as of early 2026.

How S3 Bucket Security Works by Default

A common misconception is that S3 buckets are inherently risky. In reality, all S3 buckets are private by default. When you create a new bucket, no public access is granted, and AWS automatically enables Block Public Access settings at the account level.

‍

Access is governed by a layered permission model where an explicit Deny always overrides an Allow, regardless of where it's defined. Understanding this hierarchy is the foundation of any secure configuration:

‍

  • IAM identity-based policies, control what actions a user or role can perform
  • Bucket resource-based policies, define who can access a specific bucket and under what conditions
  • Access Control Lists (ACLs), legacy object-level permissions (AWS now recommends disabling these entirely)
  • VPC endpoint policies, restrict which buckets and actions are reachable from within a VPC

AWS recommends setting S3 Object Ownership to "bucket owner enforced," which disables ACLs. This simplifies permission management significantly, instead of managing object-level ACLs across millions of objects, all access flows through bucket policies and IAM, which are far easier to audit.

AWS S3 Security Best Practices

A defense-in-depth approach means layering multiple controls rather than relying on any single setting. Here is the current AWS-recommended baseline:

‍

Practice Details
Block public access Enable S3 Block Public Access at both bucket and account levels. Enforce via Service Control Policies (SCPs) in AWS Organizations.
Least-privilege IAM Grant only specific actions each role needs. Avoid "Action": "s3:*" in production. Use presigned URLs for temporary access. Learn more about AWS IAM.
Encrypt at rest and in transit Configure default SSE-S3 or SSE-KMS encryption. Enforce HTTPS by denying requests where aws:SecureTransport is false.
Enable versioning & Object Lock Versioning preserves object history for recovery. Object Lock enforces WORM for compliance-critical data.
Unpredictable bucket names Append a GUID or random identifier to reduce risk of bucket squatting.
VPC endpoints Route internal workload traffic through VPC endpoints so it never traverses the public internet.

‍

S3 Bucket Policy Examples for Common Security Scenarios

Bucket policies are JSON documents attached directly to a bucket that define who can access it and under what conditions. Below are the most practically useful examples.

Enforce HTTPS-Only Access

{
  "Version": "2012-10-17",
  "Statement": [{
    "Sid": "RestrictToTLSRequestsOnly",
    "Effect": "Deny",
    "Principal": "*",
    "Action": "s3:*",
    "Resource": [
      "arn:aws:s3:::your-bucket-name",
      "arn:aws:s3:::your-bucket-name/*"
    ],
    "Condition": { "Bool": { "aws:SecureTransport": "false" } }
  }]
}

Deny Unencrypted Uploads (Enforce KMS)

{

"Version": "2012-10-17",

"Statement": [{

"Sid": "DenyObjectsThatAreNotSSEKMS",

"Principal": "*",

"Effect": "Deny",

"Action": "s3:PutObject",

"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::your-bucket-name/*",

"Condition": {

"Null": {

"s3:x-amz-server-side-encryption-aws-kms-key-id": "true" } } }]}

Other Common Patterns

  • Restrict to a specific VPC endpoint: Use the aws:sourceVpce condition key to ensure the bucket is only reachable from a designated private network.
  • Grant CloudFront OAI access: Allow only the Origin Access Identity principal, keeping objects private from direct URL access while serving them through the CDN.
  • IP-based restrictions: Use NotIpAddress with aws:SourceIp to deny requests from outside a trusted CIDR range.

Always use "Version": "2012-10-17" and validate policies through IAM Access Analyzer before deployment to catch unintended access grants.

Enforcing SSL with the s3-bucket-ssl-requests-only Policy

Forcing all S3 traffic over HTTPS is one of the most straightforward, high-impact controls available. The AWS Config managed rule s3-bucket-ssl-requests-only checks whether your bucket policy explicitly denies HTTP requests, flagging non-compliant buckets automatically.

‍

The policy evaluates the aws:SecureTransport condition key. When a request arrives over plain HTTP, this key evaluates to false, and the Deny statement blocks it. This applies to all principals, AWS services, cross-account roles, and anonymous requests alike. Adding the HTTPS-only Deny statement shown in the policy examples section above satisfies both the AWS Config rule and common compliance requirements under PCI-DSS and HIPAA.

Using an S3 Bucket Policy Generator Safely

The AWS Policy Generator is a useful starting point, but generated policies require careful review before going into production. Follow these steps:

‍

  • Select "S3 Bucket Policy" as the policy type, then fill in the principal, actions, resource ARN, and conditions (e.g., aws:SecureTransport or aws:SourceIp).
  • Check for overly broad principals, avoid "Principal": "*" unless intentional.
  • Verify resource ARNs are scoped correctly (bucket-level vs. object-level).
  • Use IAM Access Analyzer's "Preview external access" feature to understand the real-world effect before saving.

The generator is a scaffold, security judgment still applies. Never paste generated JSON directly into production without review.

S3 Bucket Security Checklist

Use this consolidated checklist to audit any S3 bucket configuration:

‍

Control Status
Block Public Access Enabled at account and bucket level
ACLs disabled Object Ownership set to "bucket owner enforced"
Default encryption SSE-S3 or SSE-KMS configured
HTTPS enforced Bucket policy denies aws:SecureTransport: false
Least-privilege IAM No wildcard actions in production policies
Versioning Enabled; Object Lock for sensitive data
Bucket naming Includes unpredictable identifiers
VPC endpoints Configured for internal workloads
Logging & monitoring Server access logging, CloudTrail, GuardDuty, and IAM Access Analyzer active
AWS Config rules s3-bucket-ssl-requests-only and related rules enabled
Disaster recovery Cross-region replication configured where required

‍

How Sentra Strengthens S3 Bucket Security at Scale

Applying the right bucket policies and IAM controls is necessary, but at enterprise scale, knowing which buckets contain sensitive data, how that data moves, and who can access it becomes the harder problem. This is where cloud data exposure typically occurs: not from a single misconfigured bucket, but from data sprawl across hundreds of buckets that no one has a complete picture of.

‍

Sentra discovers and classifies sensitive data at petabyte scale directly within your environment, data never leaves your control. It maps data movement across S3, identifies shadow data and over-permissioned buckets, and enforces data-driven guardrails aligned with compliance requirements. For organizations adopting AI, Sentra provides the visibility needed to ensure sensitive training data or model outputs in S3 are properly governed. Eliminating redundant and orphaned data typically reduces cloud storage costs by around 20%.

‍

S3 bucket security is not a one-time configuration task. It's an ongoing practice spanning access control, encryption, network boundaries, monitoring, and data visibility. The controls covered here, from enforcing SSL and disabling ACLs to using policy generators safely and maintaining a security checklist, give you a comprehensive framework. As your environment grows, pairing these technical controls with continuous data discovery ensures your security posture scales with your data, not behind it.

‍

Read More
Nikki Ralston
Nikki Ralston
March 15, 2026
4
Min Read

How to Evaluate DSPM and DLP for Copilot and Gemini: A Security Architect’s Buyer’s Guide

How to Evaluate DSPM and DLP for Copilot and Gemini: A Security Architect’s Buyer’s Guide

Most security architects didn’t sign up to be AI product managers. Yet that’s what Copilot and Gemini rollouts feel like: “We want this in every business unit, as soon as possible. Make sure it’s safe.”

‍

If you’re being asked to recommend or validate a DSPM platform, or to justify why your existing DLP stack is or isn’t enough, you need a realistic, vendor‑agnostic set of criteria that maps to how Copilot and Gemini actually work.

This guide is written from that perspective: what matters when you evaluate DSPM and DLP for AI assistants, what’s table stakes vs. differentiating, and what you should ask every vendor before you bring them to your steering committee.

1. Start with the AI use cases you actually have

Before you look at tools, clarify your Copilot and/or Gemini scope:

‍

  • Are you rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot to a pilot group, or planning an org‑wide deployment?
  • Are you enabling Gemini in Workspace only, or also Gemini for dev teams (Vertex AI, custom LLM apps, RAG)?
  • Do you have existing AI initiatives (third‑party SaaS copilots, homegrown assistants) that will access M365 or Google data?

This matters because different tools have very different coverage:

‍

  • Some are M365‑centric with shallow Google support.
  • Others focus on cloud infrastructure and data warehouses, and barely touch SaaS.
  • Very few provide deep, in‑environment visibility across both SaaS and cloud platforms, which is what you need if Copilot/Gemini are just the tip of your AI iceberg.

Define the boundary first; evaluate tools second.

2. Non‑negotiable DSPM capabilities for Copilot and Gemini

When Copilot and Gemini are in scope, “generic DSPM” is not enough. You need specific capabilities that touch how those assistants see and use data.

‍

2.1 Native visibility into M365 and Workspace

‍

At minimum, a viable DSPM platform must:

  • Discover and classify sensitive data across SharePoint, OneDrive, Exchange, Teams and Google Drive / shared drives.
  • Understand sharing constructs (public/org‑wide links, external guests, shared drives) and relate them to data sensitivity.
  • Support unstructured formats including Office docs, PDFs, images, and audio/video files.

Ask vendors:

  • “Show me, live, how you discover sensitive data in Teams chats and OneDrive/Drive folders that are Copilot/Gemini‑accessible.”
  • “Show me how you handle PDFs, audio, and meeting recordings - not just Word docs and spreadsheets.”

Sentra, for example, was explicitly built to discover sensitive data across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and on‑prem, and to handle formats like audio/video and complex PDFs as first‑class sources.

‍

2.2 In‑place, agentless scanning

‍

For many organizations, it’s now a hard requirement that data never leaves their cloud environment for scanning. Evaluate if the vendor scan in‑place within your tenants, using cloud APIs and serverless functions or do they require copying data or metadata into their infrastructure?

Sentra’s architecture is explicitly “data stays in the customer environment”, which is why large, regulated enterprises have standardized on it.

‍

2.3 AI‑grade classification accuracy and context

‍

Copilot and Gemini are only as safe as your labels and identity model. That requires:

  • High‑accuracy classification (>98%) across structured and unstructured content.
  • The ability to distinguish synthetic vs. real data and to attach rich context: department, geography, business function, sensitivity, owner.

Ask:

  • “How do you measure classification accuracy, and on what datasets?”
  • “Can you show me how your platform treats, for example, a Zoom recording vs. a scanned PDF vs. a CSV export?”

Sentra uses AI‑assisted models and granular context classes at both file and entity level, which is why customers report >98% accuracy and trust the labels enough to drive enforcement.

3. Evaluating DLP in an AI‑first world

Most enterprises already have DLP: endpoint, email, web, CASB. The question is whether it can handle AI assistants and the honest answer is that DLP alone usually can’t, because:

‍

  • It operates blind to real data context, relying on regex and static rules.
  • It usually doesn’t see unstructured SaaS stores or AI outputs reliably.
  • Policies quickly become so noisy that they get weakened or disabled.

The evaluation question is not “DLP or DSPM?” It’s:

“Which DSPM platform can make my DLP stack effective for Copilot and Gemini, without a rip‑and‑replace?”

‍

Look for:

  • Tight integration with Microsoft Purview (for MPIP labels and Copilot DLP) and, where relevant, Google DLP.
  • The ability to auto‑apply and maintain labels that DLP actually enforces.
  • Support for feeding data context (sensitivity + business impact + access graphs) into enforcement decisions.

Sentra becomes the single source of truth for sensitivity and business impact that existing DLP tools rely on.

4. Scale, performance, and operating cost

AI rollouts increase data volumes and usage faster than most teams expect. A DSPM that looks fine on 50 TB may struggle at 5 PB.

Evaluation questions:

  • “What’s your largest production deployment by data volume? How many PB?”
  • “How long does an initial full scan take at that scale, and what’s the recurring scan pattern?”
  • “What does cloud compute spend look like at 10 PB, 50 PB, 100 PB?”

Sentra customer tests prove ability to scan 9 PB in under 72 hours at 10–1000x greater scan efficiency than legacy platforms, with projected scanning of 100 PB at roughly $40,000/year in cloud compute.

If a vendor can’t answer those questions quantitatively, assume you’ll be rationing scans, which undercuts the whole point of DSPM for AI.

5. Governance, reporting, and “explainability” for architects

Your stakeholders, security leadership, compliance, boards, will ask three things:

‍

  1. “Where, exactly, can Copilot and Gemini see regulated data?”
  2. “How do we know permissions and labels are correct?”
  3. “Can you prove we’re compliant right now, not just at audit time?”

A strong DSPM platform helps you answer those questions without building custom reporting in a SIEM:

‍

  • AI‑specific risk views that show AI assistants, datasets, and identities in one place.
  • Compliance mappings to frameworks like GLBA, SOX, FFIEC, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and state privacy laws.
  • Executive‑ready summaries of AI‑related data risk and progress over time (e.g., percentage of regulated data coverage, number of Copilot‑accessible high‑risk stores before vs. after remediation).

Sentra’s AI Data Readiness and continuous compliance materials give a good template for what “explainable DSPM” looks like in practice.

6. Putting it together: A concise RFP checklist

When you boil it down, your evaluation criteria for DSPM/DLP for Copilot and Gemini should include:

  • In‑place, multi‑cloud/SaaS discovery with strong M365 and Workspace coverage
  • Proven high‑accuracy classification and rich business context for unstructured data
  • Identity‑to‑data mapping with least‑privilege insights
  • Native integrations with MPIP/Purview and Google DLP, with label automation
  • Real‑world scale (PB‑level) and quantified cloud cost
  • AI‑aware risk views, compliance mappings, and reporting

Use those as your “table stakes” in RFPs and technical deep dives. You can add vendor‑specific questions on top, but if a tool can’t clear this bar, it will not make Copilot and Gemini genuinely safe - it will just give you more dashboards.

<blogcta-big>

‍

Read More
Nikki Ralston
Nikki Ralston
February 22, 2026
4
Min Read

Cloud Data Protection Solutions

Cloud Data Protection Solutions

As enterprises scale cloud adoption and AI integration in 2026, protecting sensitive data across complex environments has never been more critical. Data sprawls across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and on-premise systems, creating blind spots that regulators and threat actors are eager to exploit. Cloud data protection solutions have evolved well beyond simple backup and recovery, today's leading platforms combine AI-powered discovery, real-time data movement tracking, access control analysis, and compliance support into unified architectures. Choosing the right solution determines how confidently your organization can operate in the cloud.

Best Cloud Data Protection Solutions

The market spans two distinct categories, each addressing different layers of cloud security.

Backup, Recovery, and Data Resilience

  • Druva Data Security Cloud, Rated 4.9 on Gartner with "Customer's Choice" recognition. Centralized backup, archival, disaster recovery, and compliance across endpoints, servers, databases, and SaaS in hybrid/multicloud environments.
  • Cohesity DataProtect, Rated 4.7. Automates backup and recovery across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid infrastructures with policy-based management and encryption.
  • Veeam Data Platform, Rated 4.6. Combines secure backup with intelligent data insights and built-in ransomware defenses.
  • Rubrik Security Cloud, Integrates backup, recovery, and automated policy-driven protection against ransomware and compliance gaps across mixed environments.
  • Dell Data Protection Suite, Rated 4.7. Addresses data loss, compliance, and ransomware through backup, recovery, encryption, and deduplication.

Cloud-Native Security and DSPM

  • Sentra, Discovers and governs sensitive data at petabyte scale inside your own environment, with agentless architecture, real-time data movement tracking, and AI-powered classification.
  • Wiz, Agentless scanning, real-time risk prioritization, and automated mapping to 100+ regulatory frameworks across multi-cloud environments.
  • BigID, Comprehensive data discovery and classification with automated remediation, including native Snowflake integration for dynamic data masking.
  • Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, Scalable hybrid and multi-cloud protection with AI analytics, DLP, and compliance enforcement throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Integrated multi-cloud security with continuous vulnerability assessments and ML-based threat detection across Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud.

What Users Say About These Platforms

User feedback as of early 2026 reveals consistent themes across the leading platforms.

Sentra

Pros:

  • Data discovery accuracy and automation capabilities are standout strengths
  • Compliance and audit preparation becomes significantly smoother, one user described HITECH audits becoming "a breeze"
  • Classification engine reduces manual effort and improves overall efficiency

Cons:

  • Initial dashboard experience can feel overwhelming
  • Some limitations in on-premises coverage compared to cloud environments
  • Third-party sync delays flagged by a subset of users

Rubrik

Pros:

  • Strong visibility across fragmented environments with advanced encryption and data auditing
  • Frequently described as a top choice for cybersecurity professionals managing multi-cloud

Cons:

  • Scalability limitations noted by some reviewers
  • Integration challenges with mature SaaS solutions

Wiz

Pros:

  • Agentless deployment and multi-cloud visibility surface risk context quickly

Cons:

  • Alert overload and configuration complexity require careful tuning

BigID

Pros:

  • Comprehensive data discovery and privacy automation with responsive customer service

Cons:

  • Delays in technical support and slower DSAR report generation reported

As of February 2026, none of these platforms have published Trustpilot scores with sufficient review counts to generate a verified aggregate rating.

How Leading Platforms Compare on Core Capabilities

Capability Sentra Rubrik Wiz BigID
Unified view (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, on-prem) Yes, in-environment, no data movement Yes, unified management Yes, aggregated across environments Yes, agentless, identity-aware
In-place scanning Yes, purely in-place Yes Yes, raw data stays in your cloud Yes
Agentless architecture Purely agentless, zero production latency Primarily agentless via native APIs Agentless (optional eBPF sensor) Primarily agentless, hybrid option
Data movement tracking Yes, DataTreks™ maps full lineage Limited, not explicitly confirmed Yes, lineage mapping via security graph Yes, continuous dynamic tracking
Toxic combination detection Yes, correlates sensitivity with access controls Yes, automated risk assignment Yes, Security Graph with CIEM mapping Yes, AI classifiers + permission analysis
Compliance framework mapping Not confirmed Not confirmed Yes, 100+ frameworks (GDPR, HIPAA, EU AI Act) Not confirmed
Automated remediation Sensitivity labeling via Microsoft Purview Label correction via MIP Contextual workflows, no direct masking Native masking in Snowflake; labeling via MIP
Petabyte-scale cost efficiency Proven, 9PB in 72 hours, 100PB at ~$40K Yes, scale-out architecture Per-workload pricing, not proven at PB scale Yes, cost by data sources, not volume

‍

‍

Cloud Data Security Best Practices

Selecting the right platform is only part of the equation. How you configure and operate it determines your actual security posture.

  • Apply the shared responsibility model correctly. Cloud providers secure infrastructure; you are responsible for your data, identities, and application configurations.
  • Enforce least-privilege access. Use role-based or attribute-based access controls, require MFA, and regularly audit permissions.
  • Encrypt data at rest and in transit. Use TLS 1.2+ and manage keys through your provider's KMS with regular rotation.
  • Implement continuous monitoring and logging. Real-time visibility into access patterns and anomalous behavior is essential. CSPM and SIEM tools provide this layer.
  • Adopt zero-trust architecture. Continuously verify identities, segment workloads, and monitor all communications regardless of origin.
  • Eliminate shadow and ROT data. Redundant, obsolete, and trivial data increases your attack surface and storage costs. Automated identification and removal reduces risk and cloud spend.
  • Maintain and test an incident response plan. Documented playbooks with defined roles and regular simulations ensure rapid containment.

Top Cloud Security Tools for Data Protection

Beyond the major platforms, several specialized tools are worth integrating into a layered defense strategy:

  • Check Point CloudGuard, ML-powered threat prevention for dynamic cloud environments, including ransomware and zero-day mitigation.
  • Trend Micro Cloud One, Intrusion detection, anti-malware, and firewall protections tailored for cloud workloads.
  • Aqua Security, Specializes in containerized and cloud-native environments, integrating runtime threat prevention into DevSecOps workflows for Kubernetes, Docker, and serverless.
  • CrowdStrike Falcon, Comprehensive CNAPP unifying vulnerability management, API security, and threat intelligence.
  • Sysdig, Secures container images, Kubernetes clusters, and CI/CD pipelines with runtime threat detection and forensic analysis.
  • Tenable Cloud Security, Continuous monitoring and AI-driven threat detection with customizable security policies.

Complementing these tools with CASB, DSPM, and IAM solutions creates a layered defense addressing discovery, access control, threat detection, and compliance simultaneously.

How Sentra Approaches Cloud Data Protection

For organizations that need to go beyond backup into true cloud data security, Sentra offers a fundamentally different architecture. Rather than routing data through an external vendor, Sentra scans in-place, your sensitive data never leaves your environment. This is particularly relevant for regulated industries where data residency and sovereignty are non-negotiable.

Key Capabilities

  • Purely agentless onboarding, No sidecars, no agents, zero impact on production latency
  • Unified view across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, and on-premise file shares with continuous discovery and classification at petabyte scale
  • DataTreks™, Creates an interactive map of your data estate, tracking how sensitive data moves through ETL processes, migrations, backups, and AI pipelines
  • Toxic combination detection, Correlates data sensitivity with access controls, flagging high-sensitivity data behind overly permissive policies
  • AI governance guardrails, Prevents unauthorized AI access to sensitive data as enterprises integrate LLMs and other AI systems

In documented deployments, Sentra has processed 9 petabytes in under 72 hours and analyzed 100 petabytes at approximately $40,000. Its data security posture management approach also eliminates shadow and ROT data, typically reducing cloud storage costs by around 20%.

Choosing the Right Fit

The right solution depends on the problem you're solving. If your primary need is backup, recovery, and ransomware resilience, Druva, Veeam, Cohesity, and Rubrik are purpose-built for that. If your challenge is discovering where sensitive data lives and how it moves, particularly for AI adoption or regulatory audits, DSPM-focused platforms like Sentra and BigID are better aligned. For automated compliance mapping across GDPR, HIPAA, and the EU AI Act, Wiz's 100+ built-in framework assessments offer a clear advantage.

Most mature security programs layer multiple tools: a backup platform for resilience, a DSPM solution for data visibility and governance, and a CNAPP or CSPM tool for infrastructure-level threat detection. The key is ensuring these tools share context rather than creating additional silos. As data environments grow more complex and AI workloads introduce new vectors for exposure, investing in cloud data protection solutions that provide genuine visibility, not just coverage, will define which organizations operate with confidence.

<blogcta-big>

‍

Read More
Expert Data Security Insights Straight to Your Inbox
What Should I Do Now:
1

Get the latest GigaOm DSPM Radar report - see why Sentra was named a Leader and Fast Mover in data security. Download now and stay ahead on securing sensitive data.

2

Sign up for a demo and learn how Sentra’s data security platform can uncover hidden risks, simplify compliance, and safeguard your sensitive data.

3

Follow us on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and YouTube for actionable expert insights on how to strengthen your data security, build a successful DSPM program, and more!

Before you go...

Get the Gartner Customers' Choice for DSPM Report

Read why 98% of users recommend Sentra.

White Gartner Peer Insights Customers' Choice 2025 badge with laurel leaves inside a speech bubble.